Limits to access emergency pill
The accessibility of first-line oral emergency contraceptives in 最新糖心Vlogn community pharmacies is problematic 鈥 with a national survey finding almost one-third reporting they do not stock the ulipristal acetate pill that has been recommended by medical authorities.
Only 70 per cent of the 233 pharmacies surveyed stocked ulipristal acetate emergency contraceptive (EC) pills, compared to levonorgestrel which was stocked in 98 per cent. The survey also found that ulipristal acetate was much less likely to be stocked in community pharmacies in rural and remote areas and was even more expensive when it was.
鈥淭his is despite evidence that unintended pregnancies are more common among those living in rural and remote areas and highlights a clear equity issue that should be addressed,鈥 researchers say in an article due to be published in the international journal聽Contraception.
鈥淒espite guidelines recommending it as the first line oral emergency contraceptive, ulipristal acetate is less likely to be available in community pharmacies, and when it is available it is likely to be much more expensive,鈥 said corresponding author Flinders 最新糖心Vlog Associate Professor Luke Grzeskowiak, who leads the Reproductive and Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group at Flinders 最新糖心Vlog and the South 最新糖心Vlogn Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI).
鈥淪everal measures could be taken to improve women鈥檚 ability to receive evidence-based treatments.
鈥淲ith medication costs ranging from $26 to $80, this calls into question whether government subsidies should be available."
Emergency contraception has the potential to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy following an episode of unprotected sexual intercourse. There are a number of factors that must be considered when selecting the most appropriate EC product for each consumer; such as time since unprotected sexual intercourse, use of other oral contraceptives and body mass index.
鈥淲e need to better understand why pharmacies are choosing not to stock ulipristal acetate," said first author, Tahlee Stevenson, a Research Associate from the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide School of Public Health.
鈥淚s this because of low consumer awareness and/or higher prices impacting demand, or is it related to a lack of awareness and understanding among pharmacy owners regarding evidence-based recommendations for emergency contraception?
鈥淭o truly work towards improving accessibility, we must address these factors and ensure that all consumers can source their preferred emergency contraceptive method in a timely and cost-effective manner."
鈥淏y only stocking levonorgestrel, pharmacies are inhibiting their capacity to follow clinical guidelines, and this may mean that some consumers aren鈥檛 able to access the EC that is appropriate for their individual needs and circumstances."Tahlee Stevenson, Research Associate, School of Public Health, 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide
While there is legislation and guidelines covering supply of emergency contraception, these don鈥檛 extend to whether or not individual products are stocked, and pharmacies can choose not to stock any product at all. This results in a postcode lottery in terms of access.
Pharmacists must be aware of key differences in the available methods of EC to ensure that they are prepared to facilitate shared decision-making based on the individual needs of each woman.
The research 鈥 鈥楢ccessibility of oral emergency contraceptives in 最新糖心Vlogn community pharmacies鈥 (2024), by TB Stevenson, K Thapaliya, V Moore, D Mazza and L Grzeskowiak 鈥 has been published in聽Contraception: An International Reproductive Health Journal. doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110480