Brick by brick

The laborious reconstruction of the Urrbrae Gatehouse is about more than retention of the built form.

The Urrbrae Gatehouse, pre-deconstruction

The Urrbrae Gatehouse, pre-deconstruction

In the early 1880s, Peter and Matilda Waite decided their expansive Urrbrae Estate, now the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide鈥檚 Waite campus, deserved a more formal entr茅e. They ordered the construction of Urrbrae Gatehouse, which for its early life was used as the home of the estate鈥檚 Head Gardener and their family, giving it its secondary title: The Lodge.

Memories of those who lived in the Gatehouse linger in the community, with Curator of the Waite Arboretum, , familiar with stories from people who remember it as a student residence. 鈥淵ou talk to people, 鈥極h, my grandpa lived in that house when he went to Urrbrae High School鈥,鈥 she says.

Well into the Gatehouse鈥檚 second century standing on the Waite property, a threat to its existence emerged. In 2019, the state government announced a series of intersection upgrades across metropolitan Adelaide, which included a widening of the intersection at Fullarton and Cross roads. The news was reported innocuously at first, but soon local residents began to realise this would likely impact the Waite campus.

鈥淢y first thought was 鈥極h my goodness, what is going to be left at that corner?鈥欌 says Joanna Wells, one such resident. Joanna had already seen significant canopy loss in her Netherby neighbourhood, where she says she could once look out the back porch and see only trees. 鈥淣ow I walk out to the back porch, and there鈥檚 this hole where trees used to be, which is just roofs, basically,鈥 she says. This new loss, she was not willing to bear.

Joanna spoke about her fears with a friend, and the two decided to make a banner decrying the destruction of trees for the sake of widening a road. They stood at the intersection and bandied their sign, hoping to gain attention. 鈥淧eople were winding their windows down saying, 鈥楬ey, what鈥檚 this about?鈥欌 she recalls. 鈥淲hen we told them, there was a lot of shock-horror about the trees, but the thing that got everyone going was the Gatehouse.鈥

Enquiries from punters through rolled-down windows evolved into calls from local media 鈥 newspapers, TV and radio 鈥 and public discussion ensued. Many said the loss of the Gatehouse would be a travesty, yes, but to whip up fear was unwarranted, as it was protected by State Heritage.

This turned out not to be the case.

In his capacity as Commissioner of Highways, Stephan Knoll had the power to 鈥渁cquire by agreement or compulsory process any land, or interest in land, for the purposes of present or future roadwork鈥. He said this in a letter to the Federal Member for Boothby at the time, Nicolle Flint, while also promising to 鈥渄eliver the best听outcome for the project and community鈥. The implied power to overcome heritage stoked the fire already roaring in Joanna鈥檚 belly.

A rendering of the new Gatehouse, courtesy Dash Architects.

A rendering of the new Gatehouse, courtesy Dash Architects

Joanna turned her stakeout on the intersection into a bona fide campaign. She held rallies 鈥 the largest of which attracted more than 1000 people 鈥 and collected signatures in person and via change.org.

The comments alongside the signatures were emphatic:

鈥淚nsane. This is heritage listed, and the trees provide habitat and shade.鈥

鈥淭his plan by DPTI (Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure) is totally inappropriate. We must retain the trees and the Lodge.鈥

鈥淭he lodge is a high point of taking children home up the freeway. We are getting home the trees are part of our history. We need those lungs.鈥

鈥淲e can鈥檛 keep losing these Historic Buildings.鈥

鈥淚 don鈥檛 want to see more trees removed or see a heritage building demolished.鈥

鈥淚鈥檓 signing because it鈥檚 the only way to contribute without getting angry!鈥

An amenable solution was found 鈥 though a widening of the road went ahead, and some trees were lost. To Kate, this is still a source of disappointment. 鈥淲e lost six or eight big ones, and then there was probably half a dozen, maybe up to 10 smaller ones,鈥 she says. 鈥淎nd they did replace them with trees, sure. But what people seem to forget is you can鈥檛 replace a 100-year-old tree with one single tree that鈥檚 two years old. It鈥檚 not a replacement, because you need 100 years to grow it.鈥

A silver lining, though, is the retention of the Gatehouse, which is being moved, brick by brick, and its non-heritage extension upgraded. When the rebuild is completed sometime this year, the Gatehouse will be a volunteer centre and the home of the Waite Arboretum 鈥 something Kate has long hoped might one day exist.

鈥淚t鈥檚 giving the Arboretum a lab, because we talk about the Arboretum as the living lab, but there鈥檚 no building,鈥 Kate says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a much clearer, higher profile building to bring people to, and where we can make the community much more aware of the Arboretum as a scientific endeavour, rather than just a big park with trees.鈥

This is a future for the Gatehouse made material by the community that surrounds the Waite campus 鈥 one which understands the importance of not only protecting the gift, but honouring its spirit.

鈥淧eter Waite could鈥檝e done anything with that land, and we鈥檙e really fortunate that he thought it was important enough to leave it as a whole parcel, because the value that鈥檚 come from the Arboretum alone is just significant,鈥 Joanna says. 鈥淭hat is a heritage piece in itself. A lot of it is about amenity, but it鈥檚 about appreciating the past, and it gives us that appreciation of what Peter Waite actually did. I mean, the generosity of that is just amazing.鈥

Written by Johnny Von Einem

Tagged in Lumen Waite 100, Waite 100