Time to rethink aquaculture – for nature not just for people
Marine aquaculture can be criticised for the negative effect it can have on the environment. But could aquaculture, under certain circumstances, have positive effects on surrounding ecosystems? A team of scientists from the ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog of Adelaide, The Nature Conservancy and Macquarie ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog wanted to find out.
Their conclusions are published today in . They found that while negative impacts can occur from aquaculture (largely through poorly designed, sited, regulated or operated facilities) there is a growing body of evidence to suggest we may be overlooking the broader, positive ecosystem and social benefits associated with aquaculture operations in marine environments, such as shellfish, algae and fish farming.
Lead author on the study, from the ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog of Adelaide, explains: “Our reading found that aquaculture facilities can deliver a range of goods and services that provide benefits to people and nature, beyond merely the production of food, and may be able to be designed to boost these effects.â€
Much like the ecosystem services provided free-of-charge by nature, these benefits are the goods (such as food and medicines) and services (such as water treatment, shelter/habitat for wildlife and erosion prevention).
Heading a team of scientists on the study from The Nature Conservancy, Dr Chris Gillies, Marine Manager at TNC ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog said, “we found that these benefits can sometimes mitigate and even outweigh negative impacts, which is important to bear in mind as we face the global challenge of providing food sustainably to a growing population.â€
Only a small portion of the Earth's surface is currently used for aquaculture. Its potential to produce food for a hungry world is immense. For example, it has recently been estimated the current total landings of all wild-capture fisheries could be produced using less than 0.015% of the global ocean area[1].
Aquaculture benefits can sometimes mitigate and even outweigh negative impacts, which is important to bear in mind as we face the global challenge of providing food sustainably to a growing population
DR CHRIS GILLIES
Marine Manager, TNC ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog
Ensuring aquaculture can deliver ecosystem services, without these benefits being compromised by negative impacts, requires aquaculture facilities to be more conscious of their design and their interactions with their surroundings, to maximise the positive effects.
The paper published illustrates that recognition and more active accounting of the positive benefits that might be delivered by marine aquaculture needs to occur to provide a broader and more accurate valuation of the full range of effects. If this occurs, it could be a major driver of improved ecological and social benefits from aquaculture activities, alongside economic outcomes.
[1] Gentry RR, Froelich HE, Grimm D, Kareiva P, Parke M, Rust MB, Gaines SD, Halpern BS. 2017. Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1: 1317–1324
Original story by The Nature ConservatoryÌý
Their conclusions are published today in . They found that while negative impacts can occur from aquaculture (largely through poorly designed, sited, regulated or operated facilities) there is a growing body of evidence to suggest we may be overlooking the broader, positive ecosystem and social benefits associated with aquaculture operations in marine environments, such as shellfish, algae and fish farming.
Lead author on the study, from the ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog of Adelaide, explains: “Our reading found that aquaculture facilities can deliver a range of goods and services that provide benefits to people and nature, beyond merely the production of food, and may be able to be designed to boost these effects.â€
Much like the ecosystem services provided free-of-charge by nature, these benefits are the goods (such as food and medicines) and services (such as water treatment, shelter/habitat for wildlife and erosion prevention).
Heading a team of scientists on the study from The Nature Conservancy, Dr Chris Gillies, Marine Manager at TNC ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog said, “we found that these benefits can sometimes mitigate and even outweigh negative impacts, which is important to bear in mind as we face the global challenge of providing food sustainably to a growing population.â€
Only a small portion of the Earth's surface is currently used for aquaculture. Its potential to produce food for a hungry world is immense. For example, it has recently been estimated the current total landings of all wild-capture fisheries could be produced using less than 0.015% of the global ocean area[1].
Aquaculture benefits can sometimes mitigate and even outweigh negative impacts, which is important to bear in mind as we face the global challenge of providing food sustainably to a growing population
DR CHRIS GILLIES
Marine Manager, TNC ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog
Ensuring aquaculture can deliver ecosystem services, without these benefits being compromised by negative impacts, requires aquaculture facilities to be more conscious of their design and their interactions with their surroundings, to maximise the positive effects.
The paper published illustrates that recognition and more active accounting of the positive benefits that might be delivered by marine aquaculture needs to occur to provide a broader and more accurate valuation of the full range of effects. If this occurs, it could be a major driver of improved ecological and social benefits from aquaculture activities, alongside economic outcomes.
[1] Gentry RR, Froelich HE, Grimm D, Kareiva P, Parke M, Rust MB, Gaines SD, Halpern BS. 2017. Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1: 1317–1324
Original story by The Nature ConservatoryÌý
Newsletter & social media
Join us for a sensational mix of news, events and research at the Environment Institute. Find out aboutÌýnew initiatives andÌýshare with your friends what's happening.
ÌýÌýÌý