PROJMGNT 7043 - Infrastructure 1
North Terrace Campus - Trimester 1 - 2016
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code PROJMGNT 7043 Course Infrastructure 1 Coordinating Unit Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation & Innov Centre Term Trimester 1 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Intensive: 36 to 40 hours Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y Assumed Knowledge PROJMGNT 5004, PROJMGNT 5021, PROJMGNT 7012, PROJMGNT 7056 Assessment Individual and group assignments, reports Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Indra Gunawan
Program Director Contact Details:
Project Management
Name: Dr Graciela Corral de Zubielqui
Email: graciela.corraldezubielqui@adelaide.edu.au
Phone: +61 8 8313 0125
Teaching staff:
Trimester 1/Semester 1
Name: Dr Karlson ‘Charlie’ Hargroves
Short Bio:Charlie is a Sustainable Development Fellow with the ECIC and a Senior Research Fellow with the Curtin 最新糖心Vlog Sustainability Policy Institute specialising in low carbon transitions, carbon structural adjustment, sustainable engineering, and curriculum renewal. After graduating from the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide in 2000, and working as a civil/structural design engineer, Charlie co-founded 'The Natural Edge Project' (TNEP), an internationally recognised team of action researchers based at various universities across 最新糖心Vlog including the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide, Curtin 最新糖心Vlog, QUT, and the ANU. Charlie has led the TNEP team to deliver five international books on sustainable development (selling over 80,000 copies in five languages) in collaboration with some of the world's leaders in sustainability. The first book won the 最新糖心Vlogn Banksia Award for Environmental Leadership, Education and Training in 2005, and the of the books were ranked among the 'Top 40 Sustainability Books' in the world in 2010 by the Cambridge Sustainability Leaders Program. Charlie was the founding CEO of Natural Capitalism Inc. in Colorado, USA and worked with many large companies to assist in greenhouse gas reduction initiatives.
Email: karlson.hargroves@adelaide.edu.au
Phone: 0407 071 729Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
Opening intensive:
Thursday 3rd and Friday 4th March 2016
9am to 6pm
Nexus10 UB35 Teaching Room
Closing intensive:
Thursday 14th and Friday 15th April 2016
9am to 6pm
Nexus10 UB35 Teaching Room -
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
1 Knowledge and understanding of the latest research and development of infrastructure systems for initiating development, and managing design, construction and operation of infrastructure systems 2 Application of research and professional practice tools for initiating development and managing design, construction and operation of infrastructure systems 3 Application of project models to infrastructure development, including PMBOK and complex systems models 4 Understanding and application of best practice infrastructure development models 5 Understanding and application of community consultation practices as part of a business case development 6 Understanding and application of choice of project delivery systems 7 Recognition of different interpersonal skills are required to contribute to infrastructure systems for initiating development, and managing design, construction and operation of infrastructure systems 8 Understanding of the need to maintain ethical, social and cultural standards on systems for initiating development, and managing design, construction and operation of infrastructure systems 9 A commitment to continuous learning and the capacity to maintain intellectual curiosity throughout life 10 A commitment to the highest standards of professional endeavour in the practice of these principles in taking a leadership role in the community 最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
NO TEXTBOOK
References
最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2010), Infrastructure Planning and Transport: Best Practice Case Studies, ;
最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2012), Infrastructure Planning and Delivery: Best Practice Case Studies Volume 2 ;
Ten out of 10 Ten T Project Implementation Successes, November 2011 http://tentea.ec.europa.eu/en/about_us/mission__introduction/external_communications.htm (The link below will take you directly to the pdf of the above reference)
National Infrastructure Priorities, Infrastructure 最新糖心Vlog, Department of Infrastructure and Transport; NETLIPSE Book 'Managing Large Infrastructure Projects'.Recommended Resources
References Penn, Michael R. & Parker, Philip, J (2005), Introduction to Infrastructure: Introduction to Civil and Environmental Engineering, John Wiley and Sons; Hertogh, Marcel, Baker, Stuart, Staal-Ong, Pau Lian, and Westerveld,Eddy, (2008), Managing Large Infrastructure Projects – Research on Best Practices and Lessons Learnt in Large Infrastructure Projects in Europe, NETLIPSE; www.netlipse.eu; .
Library Resources
The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide’s Barr Smith Library provides a range of learning resources including texts, journals, periodicals, magazines, and access to online databases and information services. It also offers a virtual library which is accessible via the 最新糖心Vlog’s website. The 最新糖心Vlog Library web page is:
From this link, you are able to access the Library's electronic resources.
Other resources
If you are a member of the PMI () you will “gain exclusive access to PMI publications and our global standards*, networking options with our chapters and online communities of practice, and leadership and volunteer opportunities. You’ll also receive discounts on certification exams and renewals, as well as our professional development offerings.” Student membership is USD$40 to join and USD$30 to renew.
* Log in to access complimentary read-only PDFs of all of PMI's published standards or take advantage of discounts on paperback editionsOnline Learning
MyUni is the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide's online learning environment. It is used to support traditional face-to-face lectures, tutorials and workshops at the 最新糖心Vlog. MyUni provides access to various features including announcements, course materials, discussion boards and assessments for each online course of study (see: ) -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
This course is offered in blended learning mode with the face-to-face component offered as intensives.Workload
The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.
As a guide, a 3 unit course comprises a total of 156 hours work (this includes face-to-face contact, any online components, and self directed study).Learning Activities Summary
Learning Activities Summary Intensive Content Readings 1 PPTS 1-75 in notes 最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2010), Infrastructure Planning and Transport: Best Practice Case Studies,
最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2012), Infrastructure Planning and Delivery: Best Practice Case Studies Volume 2, ,2
PPTS 1-142 in notes最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2010), Infrastructure Planning and Transport: Best Practice Case Studies,
最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2012), Infrastructure Planning and Delivery: Best Practice Case Studies Volume 2, ,3 Topics -142-168 in notes 最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2010), Infrastructure Planning and Transport: Best Practice Case Studies,
最新糖心Vlogn Government - Department of Infrastructure, (2012), Infrastructure Planning and Delivery: Best Practice Case Studies Volume 2, ,4 PPTS 169-213 in notes Expressways of Singapore Section 5.2 Notes Boston Big Dig: Section 5.4 Notes Channel Tunnel: Section 5.5 Netlipse Major Projects: Section 5.4 Notes 5 PPTS 214-253 in notes Expressways of Singapore Section 5.2 Notes Boston Big Dig: Section 5.4 Notes Channel Tunnel: Section 5.5 Netlipse Major Projects: Section 5.4 Notes 6 PPTS 254-321 in notes Choice of a project delivery system
Systemic and cascading riskSmall Group Discovery Experience
The course uses a small group discovery model to allow students to work together to interogate notes and achive peer to peer learning. In practice this means that the intesive classrooms will involve some lectures with the focus on small group exploration of provided materials with specific learning outcomes in mind. -
Assessment
The 最新糖心Vlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
An overview of the course assessment appears in the following Table. Details appear in the following section:
# Assessment Length Weighting Due Date Learning Outcomes 1a Essay/report 1000 words maximum 10% See MyUni 1-5 1b Essay/report 1000 words maximum 10% See MyUni 1-4, 6 1c Essay/report 1000 words maximum 10% See MyUni 1-4, 7 2 Group Essay/report 5000 words minimum 30% See MyUni 1-9 3 Reoprt 3,000 minimum 40% See MyUni 1-9 Total 100% Assessment Related Requirements
Students should attend all classes in order to pass the course. There is considerable experiential learning in workshops during the intensive classes that build your knowledge and thus enable you to be
successful in this course.
Course results are subject to moderation by the ECIC Board of Examiners
Assessment Detail
Assessment 1a-1c: Essay/Report (Individual)
Weighting: 10% per report
Due Dates: 1a, 1b, 1c – See MyUni
Submission Details: Online through MyUni
Task:
1a. Analyse the projects outlined in the 最新糖心Vlogn Department of Infrastructure and Transport Best Practice Guide for community consultation ONLY. What are the benefits of community consultation and either any principles which should apply? Can you find any weaknesses in the methods used and would you suggest any alternative approaches? (10%)
1b. Outline the principles for development of a business case, including feasibility studies to justify initiation of an infrastructure development; (10%);
1c. Outline the principles for choice of a project delivery system for infrastructure development. (10%)
Scope:
The objective of these questions is for the participant to consider the theoretical material supplied and attempt to apply it to a real project example, if possible. Therefore evidence of having read and understood the material is important. Arguments and assertions should be based on the research articles listed, the important ones of which are encompassed in the notes.
This assignment will assess your understanding of the course topics.
Length and Presentation:
1000 words (max) per report
Given the word limit on these questions, assessment will reward content included. There will be penalties for exceeding the word limit. Quotations do not count in the words counted.
Please ensure you add page numbers to your assignment and it is advisable to add your name in the footer or header.
Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
Late work will receive a deduction of 2 mark out of 10 for time in the first week late – beyond this zero marks will be awarded. This is to allow responses reasonably promptly.
Marks will also be deducted for submissions which exceed the stipulated length
In completing these assignments, higher marks will be awarded for comprehensiveness of content, evidence of reading notes, text and papers, (including additional reading) and integration of this theory into your answers. Direct referencing of external material in your answers is preferred.
Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1a: 1-5; 1b: 1-4, 6;
1c: 1-4, 7
Assessment 2: individual or group
Weighting: 30%
Due Dates: See MyUni
Submission Details: Online through MyUni and in class.
Task:
Identify an infrastructure project, either real or fictitious, assuming government is short of funds and probably unable to justify the project without contributions from users; develop appropriate documentation and for each of the following interfaces:
a. Completion of the brief or specification of the project an outline terms;
b. Recognition of appropriate issues leading from community consultation;
c. Documentation provided for the funds provider which includes a cost benefit justification of the project, your views on the funding approach and the major risks and how these will be managed;
d. Choice of a project delivery system including justification;
e. An outline of the roles of the design group and the delivery contractor - these may be combined in a design and construct approach if you think this is appropriate;
f. The interface between the delivery group and group managing the operating project.
Length and Presentation:
Minimum 5,000 words for one, 6,500 for two and 8,000 for 3
Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
The realism of your information will contribute, including real project documentation.
Note: additional marks are awarded for more comprehensive analysis and issues raised.
Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1-9
Assessment 3: Report
Weighting: 40%
Due Dates: See MyUni
Submission Details: Online through MyUni
Task:
Comment on the report by Prof Spiro Pollalis on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link Risk Transfer and Innovation in Project Delivery.
Criteria by which your assessment will be marked:
a. Understanding and assessment of the of techniques for community consultation and management;
b. Development of a partnering methodology;
c. Use of project delivery systems;
d. International cooperation;
e. Role of the commercial sector vis-a-vis government;
f. Risk management
Learning objectives with this assessment (refer to section 2.1): 1-9Submission
All text based assignments must be submitted via MyUni.
Please refer to step by step instructions:
There are a few points to note about the submission of assignments:
- Assignment Submission: Assignments should not be emailed to the instructor; they must be lodged via the MyUni Course site (unless specified to do both). Note that assignments may be processed via TURNITIN, which is an online plagiarism prevention tool.
- Cover Sheet: Please submit, separate to your assignment, the completed 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide Assessment Cover Sheet providing details of yourself and your team members (if applicable), your assignment, the course, date submitted, etc. as well as the declaration signed by you that this is your (your team’s) work. Note that the declaration on any electronically submitted assignment will be deemed to have the same authority as a signed declaration.
- Backup Copy of Assignments: You are advised to keep a copy of your assignments in case the submitted copy goes missing. Please ensure that all assignment pages are numbered. If your assignment contains confidential information, you should discuss any concerns with the Course Lecturer prior to submission.
- Extensions of Time: Any request for an extension of time for the submission of an assignment should be made well before the due date of the assignment to the Course Lecturer. Normally, extensions will only be granted for a maximum of two weeks from the original assignment submission date. Extensions will only be granted in cases of genuine extenuating circumstances and proof, such as a doctor’s certificate, may be required.
- Failure to submit: Failure to submit an assignment on time or by the agreed extension deadline may result in penalties and may incur a fail grade. Note that a late penalty of 5% of the total available marks for that assessment item will be incurred each day an assignment is handed in late (Unless otherwise stated in 'Assessment Related Requirements' or 'Assessment Detail' above). Assignments handed in after 14 days from the due submission date will fail even if a 100% mark is granted for the work.
Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.