最新糖心Vlog

Assessment 1:  Essay/report (Individual)
Weighting:    30%
Due Dates:     15 July, 2017
Submission Details:   Online through MyUni

Task:
Why are some projects complex? How do they differ from complicated projects? Provide some examples of complex projects.  Why have
traditional project management models failed to provide adequate structural support for complex projects?

Scope:
The objective of these questions is for the participant to consider the theoretical material supplied and attempt to apply it to a real life example, if possible. Therefore evidence of having read and understood the material is important. Arguments and assertions should be based on the research articles listed, the important ones of which are encompassed in the notes. This assignment will assess your understanding of the course topics.

Length and Presentation:
1500 words (max).
Given the word limit on these questions, assessment will reward content included. There will be penalties for exceeding the word limit. Quotations do not count in the words counted. Please ensure you add page numbers to your assignment and it is advisable to add your name in the footer or header.

Criteria by which the assignment will be graded:
In completing this assignment, higher grades will be awarded for evidence of reading notes, text and papers, and integration of this theory
into your answers. Direct referencing of external material in your answers is preferred.

Learning objectives with this assessment: 1,2,3
 


Assessment 2:  Case study presentation (Individual)
Weighting:    20%
Due Dates:     25 July, 2017
Submission Details:   In Class

Task:
Individual presentation covering the following:

* Identity a SoS;
* Use five distinguishing characteristics to describe it;
* Identify examples of and describe External Factors, which could influence the SoS;
* Identify the Governing Body;
* Describe the Feedback process between the SoS and the Governing Body;
* Identify examples of and describe Constraints affecting the Governing body’s decision making process.

Scope:
The objective of this 10 minute presentation is to demonstrate your analysis of an identified System of Systems case utilizing principal theories presented in class.

Length and Presentation:
10 minutes. Please be advised that references are mandatory to show your understanding of the subject matter. No more than 10 power point slides are permitted.  Each presentation will be followed by a Q&A session.

Criteria by which the assignment will be graded:
The criteria for grading of this assignment will be based on the depth of case analysis
and understanding of the material presented.

Learning objectives with this assessment: 1,2,3,5



Assessment 3: Reflection on Case Study presentation (Individual) report
Weighting:    10%
Due Dates:     10 August, 2017
Submission Details:   Online through MyUni

Task:
Create a brief report of 500 words as a reflection of the case study presentation as
described in Assessment 2.

Scope:
The objective of this report is to show what you have learned as a result of your individual case study presentation.

Length and Presentation:
500 words.

Criteria by which the assignment will be graded:
The criteria for grading of this assignment will be based on the depth and coherence of your analysis.

Learning objectives with this assessment: 1,2,3,5



Assessment 4:  Final report (Group)
Weighting:    30%
Due Dates:     28 August, 2017
Submission Details:    Online through MyUni. Send one copy for the group ensuring all group member names are clear.

Task:
Create a case study report for an approved project as instructed below, implementing the theoretical material you have covered. Groups should be of five people. To add additional team members, you need to seek special approval stating reasons. This assignment is intended to be the practical application of theory. As you may be using material in this report which was developed by others, it is important to note what was your contribution and what was the contribution of others.

The paper should have the following headings with the following specifications:

Abstract
-200 words or less
Introduction
-Briefly describe the complex system under consideration
-What problem is this complex system addressing for what organization, program or activity
-Define the perceived process, situation or problem presented in the case
Background Information
-Context for the complex system and your case
-Definitions that apply to the process, situation or problem: advanced terminology or jargon, explain what each word means in your study, concisely and clearly
-Relevant theories/research and prior development regarding the complex system and your case: what has other research or studies found to be true in teh complex system and your specific case
Complex System Description
-Root Definition (RD)
-History and Development
-Rich Picture/SystemiGram
-Sponsors/Customers, Industry Sector, Companies Involved, Country, Budget
-Mission/Purpose/Goals/Objectives
-Principles Characteristics
-Settings/Structure/Boundaries
-External Factors
-Governing Constraints
-Constituent Systems/Components (new/legacy, scope)
System Analysis
-Analysis and Analytical Findings
-Activities/Problems/Conflicts
-Timeframe/Sequence of events
-Methods and Tools used
-Lessons Learned
-Best Practices
-Steps and conditions for replicating the complex system elsewhere
Conclusion
-Summary of the case and your findings/recommendations
Questions for Discussions
-Please provide 2-5 questions that are based on this case and could be used for a discussion in a classroom environment
References

Scope:
The Case Study Paper is expected to reflect the following:
1. Describe a complex system;
2. Present a real life process, situation or problem;
3. Offer adequate and detailed informatino to assess the process, situation or problem by the case reader;
4. Present an objective view of the process, situation or problem;
5. Offer relevant questions for further discussion;
6. Be cogent;
7. Satisfactorily explain the basis for its conclusions.

Length and Presentation:
Minimum length:
5 people - 15,000 words

The paper should follow the style guide of the IEEE (see Template for Transactions Section at:
)

Criteria by which the assignment will be graded:
Please see Scope section above
Learning objectives with this assessment: 1-5



Assessment 5: Class contribution
Weighting: 10%
Due Dates: Ongoing in class
Task:
A class participation mark will be based on attendance and participation.
Scope:
Class attendance and active participation are expected throughout the course.
Criteria by which the assignment will be graded:
Please see Scope section above
Learning objectives with this assessment: 1-5