COMP SCI 4404 - Software Engineering Research Project

North Terrace Campus - Semester 2 - 2017

Final year research project, jointly supervised by software engineering and computer science academics with external industry involvement. The research topic will be selected from CS staff research interests, while the area of application will be negotiated with industry partners. Students will be expected to learn and demonstrate the application of SE principles to conduct research for industry based clients outside the school. The project will provide a pathway to enrolment in a higher degree by research.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	COMP SCI 4404
Course	Software Engineering Research Project
Coordinating Unit	Computer Science
Term	Semester 2
Level	Undergraduate
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	6
Contact	Up to 2 hours per week
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange
Restrictions	Available to BESE students only
Assessment	Project reports and presentation

Course Staff

Course Coordinator: Dr Christoph Treude

Coordinator: Christoph Treude

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course students will be able to:

1	Gain exposure to research in an area of software engineering
2	Learn to interpret and assess literature related to a current area of research
3	Learn to present work to an audience, both in written form and orally
4	Apply software engineering principles and research to industry projects
5	Learn to work and plan in groups

The above course learning outcomes are aligned with the Engineers 最新糖心Vlog .
The course is designed to develop the following Elements of Competency: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6

最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attributes

This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attribute	Course Learning Outcome(s)
Deep discipline knowledge informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1 accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)	1,2,4
Critical thinking and problem solving steeped in research methods and rigor based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment	1,2,3
Teamwork and communication skills developed from, with, and via the SGDE honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning	3,5
Career and leadership readiness technology savvy professional and, where relevant, fully accredited forward thinking and well informed tested and validated by work based experiences	1,2,4
Intercultural and ethical competency adept at operating in other cultures comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges	5
Self-awareness and emotional intelligence a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate	4,5

Learning Resources

Required Resources

The resources required for this course will vary with the project undertaken. Generic information will be provided as-needed on the course forums.

Recommended Resources

Resources are recommended on a group basis by project supervisors. A dedicated computer laboratory is available. Specialised computing requirements should be arranged through the project supervisor.

Online Learning

A Moodle forum (“Software Engineering Honors Research Project”) is available for announcements and discussion about the project: at : http://forums.cs.adelaide.edu.au/
Learning & Teaching Activities

Learning & Teaching Modes

Class sessions will vary from short lectures on relevant topics to small group workshops and project presentation sessions.

Workload

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

As a project course of 6 units students are expected to organise their own time between meetings. Course participants are expected to communicate frequently via the online resources used for the project. Each student is expected to devote 20 to 24 hours per week throughout the semester.

Learning Activities Summary

The Project consists of several stages, including:

1. Literature review and research proposal presentation,
2. Reporting on research findings
3. Engagement with academic supervisor and industry client
4. Implementation of research within industry project
5. Demonstration of software engineering best practice The specific content of each step is highly project dependent, and should be discussed with the project supervisor.

The 最新糖心Vlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Note: The following items and weightings are incomplete and subject to change prior to the course.

Deliverable	Assessment Type	%	CBOK Mapping
Poster and Associated Presentation	Group	10	Interpersonal Communication: 3 Problem Solving Abstraction: 3
Peer Assessment	Individual	10	Teamwork concepts & issues 3
Project Quality	Group	10	Hardware & Software 3 Data & information 3 Programming 3 Systems Development 3
Project Quality	Individual	30	Hardware & Software 3 Data & information 3 Programming 3 Systems Development 3 Change Management 2
Meeting Contributions	Individual	10	Professionalism 2 Interpersonal communications 3
Development Process - midterm	Individual	10	Teamwork concepts & issues 3 Communication 3 Human Factors 2
Development Process - final	Group	10	Teamwork concepts & issues 3 Communication 3 Human Factors 2
Development Process - final	Individual	10	Teamwork concepts & issues 3 Communication 3 Human Factors 2

Assessment Related Requirements

Hurdle Requirement: If your overall mark for the course is greater than 44 F but, your mark for the individual project quality component is less than 40%, your overall mark for the course will be reduced to 44 F.

Assessment Detail

The Project is assessed based on a number of written and oral deliverables. The final project quality is marked by two examiners and verified by all academic staff. Students mark for the group will be based on their individual performance in the project.

Meeting contributions will be assessed by academic supervisor, peer review and contributions from the industry client.

CBOK mapping:

Poster and Associated Presentation

Abstraction: 3
Design: 3
Interpersonal communications: 3
Understanding of ICT profession: 3

Peer Assessment

Professional Expectations: 3
Teamwork concepts & issues: 3
Interpersonal communications: 3
Understanding of ICT profession: 3
Human Factors: 3

Project Quality

Abstraction: 4
Design: 4
Professional Expectations: 3
Teamwork concepts & issues: 3
Hardware & Software: 5
Data & Information: 5
Programming: 5
Human Factors: 5
Systems development: 5
IT governance & organisational: 3
IT project management: 3

Meeting Contributions

Professional Expectations: 3
Teamwork concepts & issues: 3
Interpersonal communications: 3
Understanding of ICT profession: 3
Human factors: 3

Development Process

Professional Expectations: 5
Teamwork concepts & issues: 5
Interpersonal communications: 5
Understanding of ICT profession: 5
Programming: 5
Human factors: 5
Systems development: 5
IT governance & organisational: 5
IT project management: 5

Submission

Project deliverables are submitted via Git and web submission.

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
Grade	Mark	Description
FNS		Fail No Submission
F	1-49	Fail
P	50-64	Pass
C	65-74	Credit
D	75-84	Distinction
HD	85-100	High Distinction
CN		Continuing
NFE		No Formal Examination
RP		Result Pending

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Student Feedback

The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Student Support
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

最新糖心Vlog