×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog

PHIL 3032 - God, Faith and Infinity: Philosophy of Religion

North Terrace Campus - Semester 1 - 2025

Most people, historically and today, have religious beliefs of one kind or another. Those beliefs are often deeply important to their holders, providing the framework for their entire worldview. In this course, we will investigate a number of issues about religious worldviews ? about their content (Is religious language to be taken literally or metaphorically? What is the nature of God and its attributes?), as well as about their reasonableness (Are there good arguments for or against the existence of God? Do we have good evidence for belief in God ? and what is good evidence anyway?). The focus of the course will be on the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Islam, and Judaism), which share similar conceptions of the role of God and its nature. The course welcomes students both with and without religious commitments, and is run in a spirit of respectful yet rigorous inquiry.

  • General Course Information
    Course Details
    Course Code PHIL 3032
    Course God, Faith and Infinity: Philosophy of Religion
    Coordinating Unit Philosophy
    Term Semester 1
    Level Undergraduate
    Location/s North Terrace Campus
    Units 3
    Contact Up to 3 hours per week
    Available for Study Abroad and Exchange Y
    Prerequisites At least 6 units of Level II undergraduate study
    Incompatible PHIL 2044
    Assumed Knowledge At least 3 units from among PHIL 1110 or PHIL 1101 or PHIL 1111OL or PHIL 1102 or PHIL 2040
    Assessment Research Essay, Final exam, Short Writing Exercise, Discussion tasks
    Course Staff

    Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Antony Eagle

    Course Timetable

    The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

  • Learning Outcomes
    Course Learning Outcomes
    1. Demonstrate understanding of some central philosophical debates in contemporary philosophy of religion.
    2. Analyse contemporary and historical argumentative texts and extract the relevant views and arguments from them.
    3. Accurately present philosophical arguments in written form and oral contexts (individual and/or group).
    4. Evaluate philosophical arguments about religion, providing appropriate grounds.
    5. Identify and use relevant evidence to support hypotheses in philosophy of religion.
    6. Present a sustained argumentative case in written form, addressing potential counterarguments and objections.
    ​
    ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog Graduate Attributes

    This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:

    ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s)

    Attribute 1: Deep discipline knowledge and intellectual breadth

    Graduates have comprehensive knowledge and understanding of their subject area, the ability to engage with different traditions of thought, and the ability to apply their knowledge in practice including in multi-disciplinary or multi-professional contexts.

    1,2

    Attribute 2: Creative and critical thinking, and problem solving

    Graduates are effective problems-solvers, able to apply critical, creative and evidence-based thinking to conceive innovative responses to future challenges.

    2,3,4,5

    Attribute 3: Teamwork and communication skills

    Graduates convey ideas and information effectively to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes and contribute in a positive and collaborative manner to achieving common goals.

    3,6

    Attribute 4: Professionalism and leadership readiness

    Graduates engage in professional behaviour and have the potential to be entrepreneurial and take leadership roles in their chosen occupations or careers and communities.

    2,3,4,5,6

    Attribute 5: Intercultural and ethical competency

    Graduates are responsible and effective global citizens whose personal values and practices are consistent with their roles as responsible members of society.

    1,2,3

    Attribute 8: Self-awareness and emotional intelligence

    Graduates are self-aware and reflective; they are flexible and resilient and have the capacity to accept and give constructive feedback; they act with integrity and take responsibility for their actions.

    1, 2
  • Learning Resources
    Required Resources

    Set readings are provided online through an electronic reading list distributed through MyUni.

    &²¹³¦¾±°ù³¦;&´¡³¦¾±°ù³¦;€&´¡³¦¾±°ù³¦;‹
    Recommended Resources

    There is a book which contains many of the course readings, plus useful supplementary material. We do not use it as a textbook, but it may be helpful for you, particularly if you are thinking about how to put the readings into a broader context (especially when looking for resouces for your essays):

    Graham Oppy and Michael Scott (eds.), Reading Philosophy of Religion, Wiley-Blackwell 2010, ; .

  • Learning & Teaching Activities
    Learning & Teaching Modes
    This course is taught by a mixture of online lectures and whole-class workshops. There are about 2 hours worth of lecture recordings per week, broken up typically into 3–5 topic-focussed videos.

    The workshop is devoted to discussion of weekly lecture material. Students engage with an online discussion board prior to the workshop, which gives everyone a chance to engage with the material substantively before the class takes place. Participation is assessed based on the pre-class discussion board; attendance at the workshop itself is optional.
    Workload

    The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

    WorkloadTotal Hours per semester
    Structured Learning
    1 x 2 hour workshop per week, except week 1 22
    Self-directed learning
    Lecture materials and required reading (6hrs per week) 72
    Discussion forum preparation 11
    Exam preparation (1.25 hours per week) 15
    Written assignment preparation (2.5 hours per week) 30
    TOTAL 150
    &²¹³¦¾±°ù³¦;&´¡³¦¾±°ù³¦;€&´¡³¦¾±°ù³¦;‹
    Learning Activities Summary
    WEEKLECTURE TOPIC
    1 Introduction; the concept of God
    Part I: Does God Exist?
    2 Ontological arguments
    3 Cosmological arguments
    4 Argument(s) from Evil
    5 God and morality
    Part II: The Divine Attributes
    6 Omnipotence
    7 Omniscience
    Part III: Belief in God
    8 Pascal’s wager
    9 The Ethics of Belief
    10 The rationality of faith
    11 The significance of religious disagreement
    Conclusion
    12 The interpretation of religious language
    ​
  • Assessment

    The ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

    1. Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
    2. Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
    3. Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
    4. Assessment must maintain academic standards.

    Assessment Summary
    ASSESSMENT TASKTASK TYPEWEIGHTINGCOURSE LEARNING OUTCOME(S)
    Research Essay Summative/Formative 40% 1,2,3,4,5,6
    Final exam Summative 30% 1,2,3,4,5,6
    Short Writing Exercise Summative/Formative 20% 1,2,3,4
    Discussion tasks Formative/Summative 10% 1,2,3,4,5
    ​
    Assessment Detail
    AssessmentDescriptionWeighting
    Research Essay Essay of ~2000 words covering a topic from the latter part of the course. Essays will be expected to go beyond prescribed course material and will require further research. 40%
    Final exam Invigilated in-person exam (open book/open note) consisting of short essay questions and short answer questions, with student involvement in question generation 30%
    Short Writing Exerise Written assessment of ~1000 words on material from the early part of the course, prioritising text and lecture engagement 20%
    Discussion tasks Students provide a short answer to a prior suggested question through an online discussion board, as the basis for in-class discussion. Evaluated over the course of the semester. Weekly evaluation on a complete/incomplete basis. 10%

    This course is assessed by means of written work of various sorts, which is essential to build the fundamental philosophical skills of close analysis, extended complex argument, attention to detail, and the articulation of thought. Achievement of the learning outcomes in this course requires that you build skills in the analysis of written texts, you develop knowledge of various philosophical positions, and you understand how to construct a persuasive written argument. Some of these things can be done, to an extent, by a variety of generative AI tools, the use of which therefore tends to obscure the degree to which students have mastered the basic skills of understanding and summarising course materials and generating and expressing their own thoughts on the topics.

    Accordingly, in this course the use of generative AI tools is strongly discouraged, and the use of any AI tools to generate ideas or give feedback on content or argument of assessment pieces is prohibited, as is any use of AI to produce work for submission. You may use elementary features of such tools to undertake spelling and grammar checking and to make suggestions about style and concision. This course has an invigilated exam to provide a secure check on student’s attainment and to validate performance on other assessment tasks.

    ​
    Submission

    This course is assessed by written essays and an invigilated end of semester exam. The exam is to be undertaken at the time directed under standard ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog conditions.

    All essays and weekly discussion prompt answers must be submitted electronically through MyUni. This semester, I will be using Cadmus to help scaffold best practice in assessment design and to encourage and bolster academic integrity. I will be interested to hear your feedback about how effective it is. I will update you during the first few weeks of semester on how to use the platform. It is ultimately your responsibility to submit assessments correctly.

    Further details about assesment and marking will be available through the course MyUni page.

    ​
    Course Grading

    Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

    M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
    Grade Mark Description
    FNS   Fail No Submission
    F 1-49 Fail
    P 50-64 Pass
    C 65-74 Credit
    D 75-84 Distinction
    HD 85-100 High Distinction
    CN   Continuing
    NFE   No Formal Examination
    RP   Result Pending

    Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

    Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

    Final results for this course will be made available through .

  • Student Feedback

    The ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

    SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.

  • Student Support
  • Policies & Guidelines
  • Fraud Awareness

    Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student’s disciplinary procedures.

The ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The ×îÐÂÌÇÐÄVlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.