COMMERCE 7016OL - Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics (M)
Online - Quadmester 1 - 2014
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code COMMERCE 7016OL Course Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics (M) Coordinating Unit Adelaide Business School Term Quadmester 1 Level Postgraduate Coursework Location/s Online Units 3 Course Staff
Dr Jeffrey Keddie
jeffrey.keddie@monash.edu
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
At the end of this course, you will be able to:- Explore the relationship between ethics and business and the subsequent theories of justice and economics across different cultural traditions.
- Explain the relationship between ethics, morals and values in the workplace.
- Formulate ethical philosophy to explain how it contributes to current practice.
- Analyse some of the competing demands on business when scrutinising the ethics of business activity.
- Critically apply understanding of ethics to real-world contexts. Gather and analyse information by way of undertaking a research project on a topic relevant to business ethics.
最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) The ability to locate, analyse, evaluate and synthesise information from a wide variety of sources in a planned and timely manner. 6 An ability to apply effective, creative and innovative solutions, both independently and cooperatively, to current and future problems. 3, 5 Skills of a high order in interpersonal understanding, teamwork and communication. 6 A commitment to continuous learning and the capacity to maintain intellectual curiosity throughout life. 3, 5 An awareness of ethical, social and cultural issues within a global context and their importance in the exercise of professional skills and responsibilities. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 -
Learning Resources
Required Resources
Wicks, A.C., Freeman, R.E., Werhane, P.H. and Martin, K.E. (2010). Business Ethics: A
Managerial Approach. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN 13:978-0-13-142792-1
List assigned articles and resources by week. This does not include assigned textbook readings.
W1 Chapter 1: Ethical Reasoning and Marketing Decisions – Murphy et al (2005) Solomon, R. C. (2009) ‘It’s Good Business’, in Shaw, H., Barry, V. & Sansbury, G. Moral Issues in Business (Asia-Pacific edn.). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning, pp. 37-46. W2 Kohlberg, L. & Hersh, R. (1977) ‘Moral development: A review of the theory’, Theory into Practice, 16, pp. 53-59.
Gilligan, C. (1982) ‘Woman’s Place in Man’s Life Cycle’, in In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory in Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard 最新糖心Vlog Press, pp. 5-23.W3 Norton, T. (1992) ‘The Narcissism and Moral Mazes of Corporate Life: A Commentary on the writings of H. Schwartz and R. Jackall’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(1), 75-81. W4 Crane, A. & Matten, D. (2010) Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. (3rd edn.). Oxford: Oxford 最新糖心Vlog Press, pp. 91-104.
Hardin, G. (1974) ‘Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor’, Psychology Today, September, pp. 38 & 40-43.W5 Chapter 5: “Corporate Social Responsibility” in Hartman and Des Jardines (eds) Business Ethics: Decision-Making for Personal Integrity MgGraw-Hill_Irwin (2010):
5-1”Rethinking the Social Responsibility of Business: A Reason Debate Featuring Milton Friedman, Whole Food’s John Mackey and Cypress Semiconductor’s T.J. Rodgers. 5-2 “Does it Pay to Be Good?” A.J. VoglW6 Friedman, M. (1970) “The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits”, New York Times Magazine, 13 September.
Freeman, R. E. (2009) ‘Managing for Stakeholders’, in Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E. & Arnold, D. G. (2009) Ethical Theory and Business. (8th edn.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, pp. 56-68.
Lawrence, A.T. & Weber, J. (2008) ‘Shell Oil in Nigeria’ in Lawrence, A.T. & Weber, J. Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. (12th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin, pp. 520-530.W7 Maitland, I. (2005) ‘The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshops’, in Hartman, L. P. Perspectives in Business Ethics. (3rd edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill, pp. 476-513.
Lee, M. & Ruhe, J. (1999) ‘Ethical mindsets of Christianity and Confucianism: A comparative study’, International Journal of Value-Based Management, 12, pp. 13-27W8 Rice, G. (1999) ‘Islamic ethics and the implications for business’ Journal of Business Ethics, 18, pp. 345-358.
Weber, M. (2002) ‘The Protestant ethic and “spirit” of capitalism’ in The Protestant ethic and the ‘spirit’ of capitalism and other writings (eds. Baehr, P. & Wells, G. C.). New York: Penguin Books
Weber, M. (2002) ‘The Protestant ethic and “spirit” of capitalism’ in The Protestant ethic and the ‘spirit’ of capitalism and other writings (eds. Baehr, P. & Wells, G. C.). New York: Penguin Books.
Lee, M. & Ruhe, J. (1999) ‘Ethical mindsets of Christianity and Confucianism: A comparative study’, International Journal of Value-Based Management, 12, pp.13-27
Recommended Resources
Recommended Journals include:
- Business Ethics Quarterly
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Business and Society
- Business and Society Review
- Economics and Philosophy
Online Learning
Each week’s module is accessible via the LEARN site. Each module contains an overview of the week’s content, links to the week’s lecture and cases (on those weeks where cases are included), and tutorial and case discussion forums. -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
No information currently available.
Workload
No information currently available.
Learning Activities Summary
No information currently available.
-
Assessment
The 最新糖心Vlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
No information currently available.
Assessment Detail
No information currently available.
Submission
No information currently available.
Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.
