最新糖心Vlog

Professor John Williams
Director, South 最新糖心Vlogn Law Reform Institute
Ligertwood Building
Ph: 8313 5582

The key learning objective of the course is to foster in students an appreciation of the methods of law reform and the distinct role a law reform agency has in the modernisation of the law.  In particular, this course aims to enable students:

1)   to appreciate the historical context within which law reform agencies operate;
2)   to identify the challenge of law reform and the means by which it has been achieved;
3)   to analyse a defined area of law and provide a critique of its operation;
4)   to undertake high level research of the law within its comparative and policy dimensions;
5)   to present arguments, both oral and written in relation to a specific legal problem; and
6)    to critique and reflect upon draft reports and documents.

LLB Graduate Attributes

Students who successfully complete the subject Law Reform will satisfy the following LLB graduate attributes:

Knowledge

a)   A law graduate from the Law School at the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide will have a clear and detailed knowledge and understanding of the basic principles of the 最新糖心Vlogn legal system, including the separation of powers, the role of courts, the legislative process, and the role and control of the executive. 

b)   The law graduate will also have knowledge and understanding of the development of law and legal principle within the subject area of Law Reform and the specific area of the reform project. They will have the capacity to maintain appropriate familiarity with, and a capability to access the content of, legal principle in this area.

Intellectual and Social Capabilities

a)   A law graduate will have the cognitive skills to analyse, evaluate and synthesise information from a wide variety of sources and experiences so as to identify and address as appropriate legal and related issues.

b)   A law graduate will have an awareness and appreciation of the incompleteness of law and the continuous state of development of legal principle in response to social and technical change, and a capacity to respond to such change and assist such development as appropriate.

c)   A law graduate will have critical thinking and problem solving skills.

d)   A law graduate will have oral and written communication skills of a high order.

e)   A law graduate will have skills to work both independently and cooperatively, in a professional environment.

f)    A law graduate will have the capacity and commitment to learn and maintain intellectual curiosity, and to engage in life-long personal and professional learning.

Attitudes and Values

a)   A law graduate will have a commitment to the rule of law.

b) A law graduate will have an understanding of social and cultural diversity and sensitivity of the operation of the law and legal 最新糖心Vlog in that context.

Text Book

Brian R. Opeskin and David Weisbrot (eds), The Promise of Law Reform (Federation Press, 2005)

Depending upon the law reform project the relevant legislation will be required. This will be discussed at the seminar.

Students should also be aware of the Commonwealth, State and Territory Law Reform bodies which are listed on the .

Seminars

The primary teaching mode will be seminars. Students will be required to come to seminars fully prepared to enter into the discussions relating to the materials. Questions will be provided relating to the readings that will help to focus and structure the individual learning of students.

The seminar will be an important part of the learning in this course. Students will be expected to contribute to the seminar and in doing so develop their communication and presentation skills. Students will regularly be called upon to present and lead discussion of the materials and their individual research.

In addition to seminar attendance and discussion, weekly research activities may be assigned. Students will use these structured exercises to inform discussion of particular activities undertaken in class.

Law Reform A and Law Reform B together form one continuing 3 unit subject. The course runs over both Semester 1 and 2 of the academic year. Students will have 2 hours of class time per week plus up to 1 hour of structured activities.

Students will expect to spend at least 3 hours each week in independent study related to the course.

Semester I

	Seminar	Activities	Assessment
Week 1	Introduction	Discussion of course and course materials Discussion of SALRI and its role in this course Introduction to law reform resources
Week 2	Part 1: Law reform in legal education	Critical discussion of set reading	Literature and Case Review Topics assigned
	Part 2: The history of law reform in 最新糖心Vlog	Critical discussion of set reading
	Part 3: Assignment topic	Discussion of topic and assessment process explained
Week 3	Part 1: The history of law reform in 最新糖心Vlog (continued)	Part 1: Critical discussion of set reading
	Part 2: Assignment topic - policy aims for reform and relevant South 最新糖心Vlogn laws	Part 2: Group discussion
Week 4	Part 1: Law reform methods	Critical discussion of set reading
	Part 2: Presentation by Law Librarian	Refresh legal research skills for law reform
Week 5	Part 1: The history of law reform in South 最新糖心Vlog	Critical discussion of set reading
	Part 2: Legal citation	Discussion and quiz
Week 6	Assignment 1: Current law on assignment topic Critiques in law reform reports and articles	Assigned group presentation and discussion
MID SEMESTER BREAK
Week 7	Part 1: Institutional arrangements and models Law reform methods (continued)	Critical discussion of set reading
	Part 2: Assignment 1 - Progress reports	Assigned group presentation and discussion
Week 8	Part 1: Law reform outcomes	Critical discussion of set reading
	Part 2: Assignment 1 - Progress reports	Discussion
Week 9	Student presentation of Assignment	Presentation and peer critique	Presentation
Week 10	Student presentation of Assignment	Presentation and peer critique	Presentation
Week 11	Student presentation of Assignment	Presentation and peer critique	Presentation
Week 12	Student presentation of Assignment	Presentation and peer critique	Presentation Literature & Case Review due

Please note that this summary refers to assessment for the whole year (Law Reform Part A in Semester 1 and Law Reform Part B in Semester 2).

The Semester 1 assessment is the Literature and Case Review (35% of the total marks for this course).

The Semester 2 assessment is the Research Assignment (55% of the total marks for this course).

Class participation is one mark assessed over both Semester 1 and Semester 2 (10% of the total marks for this course). 

Assessment Task	Word Limit	Percentage (%)	Redeemable (Y or N)
Class Participation	-	10	N
Literature and Case Review
Written Assignment	1500	30	N
Assignment Presentation	-	5	N
Research Assignment
Written Assignment	3500	50	N
Assignment Presentation	-	5	N

Participation in Seminars – weighting 10%
Students will be assessed on the quality of their contribution to the seminars.This assessment will address the following learning objectives identified in the assessment scheme: 2 (a-c) and (e). Students should be able to engage in the literature and present opinions and foster discussion based upon the materials. In particular students will:

• address specific questions raised by the literature and the seminar leader, and
• give presentations of their assignments to the class and critique the presentations of other students.

AND

Literature and Case Review – weighting 35%
Students will present a literature and case review relating to the research project. This assessment will address the following learning objectives identified in the assessment scheme: 2.1 (c-f). There will be an emphasis on the research and presentation of the review

For this assessment, students will be required to submit a written paper AND give a seminar presentation of their review to the class before submitting the written paper for assessment. This assessment task has a weighting of 35% of the mark for the course, comprising 30% for the written paper and 5% for the presentation.The written Literature and Case Review is due on the last day of Semester 1 Week 12.

AND

Research Assignment – weighting 55%
The Research Assignment will address the following learning objective identified in the assessment scheme: 2.1 (c-f). The Research Assignment will be determined by the particular project being undertaken by the Law Reform Institute. Specific aspects of the research activity will be determined by the end of Semester 1. The research assignment will allow students to undertake research and demonstrate a capacity to identify a research question and analyse relevant legal materials.For this assessment, students will be required to submit a written paper AND give a seminar presentation of their review to the class before submitting the written paper for assessment. This assessment task has a weighting of 55% of the mark for the course, comprising 50% for the written paper and 5% for the presentation.

The written Research Assignment is due on the last day of Semester 2 Week 12.

All assessment is summative. All assessment is compulsory. All assessment is to be undertaken individually. Although there are collaborative activities all assessment task are to be undertaken by the individual student.

Replacement Research Assignment
Where a student fails the course but qualifies for replacement assessment under the Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessments, they will be required to submit a new Replacement Research Assignment on a new topic provided by the course co-ordinator. This Replacement Research Assignment topic will cover a wide range of material examined in the course and will be due two weeks after the posting of the final results for the course.  Formal requirements for the Replacement Research Assignment will be the same as for the primary Research Essay, however the Replacement Research Assignment will be weighted in accordance with the Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment policy.

 

PARTICIPATION IN SEMINARS – weighting: 10% of the total marks for this course (one mark applies to participation over the whole year ie: in both Semester 1 and Semester 2)

Students are expected to attend and participate fully in seminars.

Grade Descriptors for Class Participation are as follows:

High Distinction 85-100
Regular attendance at classes, outstanding level of quality contribution to class discussion demonstrating a strong understanding of concepts, high level of analysis and strong capacity to identify issues, clear understanding of cases and materials, strong responsiveness to the contributions of others and evidence of thorough reading of set material and preparation for class.

Distinction 75-84
Regular attendance at classes, frequent contributions to class discussion of a highly developed nature demonstrating clear understanding of concepts, high level of analysis and clear capacity to identify issues, sound understanding of cases and materials, strong responsiveness to the contributions of others and evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.

Credit 65-74
Regular attendance at classes, frequent contributions to class discussion demonstrating thoughtful approach to materials and clear understanding of concepts, capacity to analyse cases and material and identify issues, responsiveness to the contributions of others and evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.

Pass 50-64
Regular attendance at classes, limited contributions to class discussion but adequate to demonstrate understanding of concepts and capacity to analyse cases and material and identify issues, basic responsiveness to the contributions of others and evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.

Fail 0-49
Failure to regularly attend classes, limited contributions and lack of responsiveness to questions, inability to demonstrate understanding of concepts or capacity to analyse cases and material and identify issues, limited or poor evidence of reading set material and preparation for class.

LITERATURE AND CASE REVIEW – weighting 35%
Each student must complete a 1500 word (maximum) literature and case review. The specific topic of the review will be outlined in week 2 of semester 1. Copies of the specific topics will be available at the seminar and on MyUni.

Due Date
The Literature and Case Review Assignment is due by 2.00pm on the last day of Semester 1 Week 12 .

There will be a penalty for late submissions of 10% per day or part day. This penalty is NOT 10% of the mark but of the assessment. For example an assignment that obtains a mark of 70% which is two days late will incur a penalty of 20%. The final mark would be 50%.

The literature and case review does require independent research. The objective of the review is to allow students to research and draft a background research paper on a specific topic. The review will take the form a commentary on the relevant literature as well as the relevant cases. In general the review paper will be akin to an annotated bibliography and summary of the leading cases and relevant articles, legislation and law reform papers on the topic.

The review requires original and independent research AND a presentation of the written paper to the class before it is submitted for assessment. The written paper will be assessed at 30% and the presentation will be assessed at 5% of the mark for this course.

In citing materials in footnotes the referencing system used in The 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation (3rd edition, 2010) (‘AGLC3’) should be followed. AGLC3 is available for purchase from bookshops or may be accessed at .

In assessing the literature and case review the quality of the research and presentation of the key findings will be important.

Grade Descriptors for Literature and Case Review

A more specific guide to the criteria required for achievement in the various grades, is as follows:

High Distinction 85-100
Outstanding level of quality work demonstrating a strong appreciation of the relevant research question, high level of analysis and strong capacity to identify issues, clear understanding of cases and literature. Outstanding level of quality of language, spelling and grammar; and complete accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.

Distinction 75-84
Work of a highly developed nature demonstrating clear understanding of appreciation of the relevant research question, high level of analysis and clear capacity to identify issues, sound understanding of cases and literature. Very high level of quality of language, spelling and grammar; and very high rate of accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.

Credit 65-74
Work demonstrating thoughtful approach to materials and clear understanding of the relevant research question, and evidence of basic research and understanding of the cases and literature. High level of quality of language, spelling and grammar; and high rate of accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.

Pass 50-64
Work that is limited but adequate to demonstrate understanding of the research question and capacity to analyse obvious cases and literature. Competent level of quality of language, spelling and grammar; and few errors in accuracy in use of correct forms of legal citation.

Fail 0-49
Poor quality work and lack of responsiveness to the research questions, inability to demonstrate understanding of concepts or capacity to analyse cases and literature. Poor quality of language, spelling and grammar; and inaccurate use of correct forms of legal citation.

RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT – weighting 55% 

For further information on the Research Assignment, please refer to the Course Outline for Law Reform Part B.

 

By the due date all submissions should be handed in through the assignment slot near the entry to the front office of the Law School, main enter foyer, Ligertwood Building and an electronic copy emailed to the Course Coordinator.

All Assignments must comply with the following:

All Assignments should be one and a half spaced and have margins wide enough to allow for comments and feedback by the examiner.

Students must also submit an electronic copy of their assignment in Word format to the Course Coordinator by the due date for the assignment.

Students must retain a copy (including an electronic copy) of the Seminar Paper and Research Essay they submit. Students may be required to submit their seminar paper and/or research essay to an electronic plagiarism detection software (SafeAssign or Turnitin) and, in any event, are encouraged to use these software programs themselves as a check for plagiarism and the academic integrity of their work.

All Assignments must be attached to a signed Assignment Cover Sheet. Examiners will withhold a student’s results until such time as the student has signed the Assignment Cover Sheet. Examiners can refuse to accept assignments that do not have a signed acknowledgement of the 最新糖心Vlog’s policy on academic honesty/plagiarism (refer to policy below). Students must also include on the coversheet a statement as to word length to their Seminar Paper and Research Essay.

Courses for which a result of conceded pass has been obtained may not be presented towards the degree requirements for the Bachelor of Laws or the Honours Degree of Bachelor of Laws programs, or any postgraduate law program, nor to satisfy prerequisite requirements within any law course.

The 最新糖心Vlog Writing Centre provides academic learning and language development services and resources for local, international, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework students enrolled at the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide.

Practical advice and strategies for students to master reading, writing, note-taking, time management, oral presentation skills, referencing techniques and exam preparation for success at university through seminars, workshops and individual consultations.

For more information please check out the Writing Centre website at

Further information regarding the Law School Policies and Procedures in relation to Supplementary Assessment, Extensions, and Remarks etc can be found at:

Plagiarism and other forms of cheating

Plagiarism is a serious act of academic misconduct. All students must be familiar with the Adelaide Law School Enrolment Guide 2014, and should note in particular the sections relating to plagiarism, grievance procedures and academic conduct within the Law School and the 最新糖心Vlog.

Plagiarism is a serious matter and is treated as such by the Law School and the 最新糖心Vlog. Please be aware that “academic dishonesty” (which goes beyond plagiarism) can be a ground for a refusal by the Supreme Court of South 最新糖心Vlog to refuse to admit a person to practice as a legal practitioner in South 最新糖心Vlog.

Academic honesty is an essential aspect of ethical and honest behaviour, which is central to the practice of the law and an understanding of what it is to be a lawyer.