LAW 7153 - Personal Property Security Law

North Terrace Campus - Winter - 2019

This course concerns the system for creation and enforcement of security interests over personal property, and as such falls within the areas of banking, commercial, corporate and/or finance law. The course will focus on the Personal Property Securities Act (Cth) 2009, which implemented a new National system for attachment and perfection of security interests, with an online registration system providing rules for notice and priorities. This legislation effected a sea-change in the approach to familiar concepts of common law and equity such as title and charges, and the traditional understanding of 'security', as well as the method, and effect, of enforcement of security. The course involves complex problem-solving and builds on students existing knowledge of commercial law. The course may cover the following topics and will be taught comparatively in some aspects, drawing on New Zealand and Canadian case law: (i) The history and policy of personal property security legislation (ii) The interaction of PPSA with other Federal and State commercial, property ,and consumer law (iii) The concept and function of security (iv) Policy of registration (v) Validity of security agreements and the rights of the parties (vi) The impact of the PPSA on third parties (vii) PPSA and insolvency (viii) Priorities (ix) Default and enforcement The nature and mix of assessment tasks may vary from year to year according to the format in which the course is taught, and/or the teacher(s) involved.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	LAW 7153
Course	Personal Property Security Law
Coordinating Unit	Adelaide Law School
Term	Winter
Level	Postgraduate Coursework
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	3
Contact	Intensive
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange	Y
Prerequisites	Students without a Bachelor of Laws must have completed LAW 7177
Assessment	Assessment in a course of this kind would typically include one or more of the following: an exam (either invigilated or take-home), a research essay, a class presentation, and/or assessment of contributions to class discussion.

Course Staff

Course Coordinator: Associate Professor David Brown

Course Coordinator: Associate Professor David Brown
Room 2.20, Ligertwood Building d.brown@adelaide.edu.au
Phone: 8313 4442

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Course Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this course, students will be able to:

(1) apply and extend knowledge from undergraduate courses to more complex and novel situations

(2) develop and employ a sound understanding of the history, policy, provisions
and principles of secured transactions law and its international context

(3) sustain legal argumentation in novel and complex contexts

(4) apply written and oral skills to identify evaluate and synthesise legal principles from both practical and policy perspectives including adoption of a comparative approach where relevant

(5) develop an ability to identify and critically analyse policy and theoretical arguments relevant to secured transactions, and apply legislation and caselaw in a professional and practical context

(6) apply excellent research skills to practical problem-solving and critical analysis of law and policy of secured transactions in a domestic and international context

最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attribute	Course Learning Outcome(s)
Deep discipline knowledge informed and infused by cutting edge research, scaffolded throughout their program of studies acquired from personal interaction with research active educators, from year 1 accredited or validated against national or international standards (for relevant programs)	1-6
Critical thinking and problem solving steeped in research methods and rigor based on empirical evidence and the scientific approach to knowledge development demonstrated through appropriate and relevant assessment	1-6
Teamwork and communication skills developed from, with, and via the SGDE honed through assessment and practice throughout the program of studies encouraged and valued in all aspects of learning	3-6
Career and leadership readiness technology savvy professional and, where relevant, fully accredited forward thinking and well informed tested and validated by work based experiences	1-6
Intercultural and ethical competency adept at operating in other cultures comfortable with different nationalities and social contexts able to determine and contribute to desirable social outcomes demonstrated by study abroad or with an understanding of indigenous knowledges	1,2,3,6
Self-awareness and emotional intelligence a capacity for self-reflection and a willingness to engage in self-appraisal open to objective and constructive feedback from supervisors and peers able to negotiate difficult social situations, defuse conflict and engage positively in purposeful debate	3,4,5

Learning & Teaching Modes

This course is being offered in two parallel formats. (1) Fully online (2) Face to face. The face to face sessions will be on Friday 5th July, Saturday 6 July, Friday 12 July, Saturday 13 July between 9-4

This intensive course will consist of lecturing, in the initial phases, then classroom discussion of problem-based questions, preseantations and policy discussion building on introductory lectures.

Workload

The information below is provided as a guide to assist students in engaging appropriately with the course requirements.

This is a three-unit course and the university workload measurement for students on this course, including class contact time, is 156 hours. This includes any required pre-reading before the classes commence, and any research and writing of assignments after the end of formal classes.

Learning Activities Summary

Friday 5 July	The Evolution and History of Personal Property Security Legislation The Rationale for Reform and the Objectives of the PPSA Nature of Secured Credit Overview and Scope of PPSA The Structure of the 最新糖心Vlogn PPS Legislation International Aspects
Saturday 6 July	Attachment and Enforceability Perfection Registration and Ineffective Registration Priority Regime including PMSIs Transfers of collateral, taking free rules
Friday 12 July	Insolvency; Enforcement; Conflict of Laws Capstone application of prior learning through case studies and problems
Saturday 13 July	Class Presentations Research Essay preparation/consultation

Specific Course Requirements

There are no additional requirements for completion of this course other than described elsewhere in this document.

The 最新糖心Vlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Assessment Task	Task Type	Due	Weighting	Length	Redeemable	Course Learning Outcome
Class Participation	Individual Assessment	Ongoing	5%		No	1-5
Quiz	Individual Assessment	Sunday 7th July 5 pm	15%		No	1,2
Case comment and group presentation	Group presentation but Individual Assesment for Presentation and Paper combined	Paper: Wednesday 10 July 12 noon Presentation: Saturday 13th July 4 pm	15%	1000 words	No	1-5
Research Essay	Individual Assessment	Saturday 27th July 5 pm	65%	5500 words	No	1-6

Assessment Detail

Class participation (5%). This will be assessed at the end of the course based on ongoing participation in class (physically or virtually depending on whether students are taking the course by face to face or online method) and in all cases also through contributions via MyUni Discussion Board .
Quiz (online) (15%). The quiz will test fundamental knowledge acquired in the first two days of the course.
Case Comment- Oral presentation and 1000 word paper (15%). In addition to general participation and responding to questions in class students will be expected to make a class presentation in pairs or groups on a case to be allocated on day 1 of the course. The presentation will take place during class on Saturday 13th July. Any students in the online stream will give their presentation virtually via Zoom. Students will prepare an individual paper to be submitted to the Instructor via Turnitin/MyUni by Wednesday 10 July 12 noon. The instructor will distribute these papers to the whole class later that day. Please note that although the presentation will be in pairs/groups, assessment for the presentation + paper combined is Individual Assessment, not a group mark.
Research Essay 5500 words (65%), due date 27th July 5pm

NOTES ON ASSESSMENT

1. Written assignments must be typed on double-spaced A4 paper with a 10 or 12 point font such as Ariel or Times New Roman, and should be printed double-sided where possible, for environmental reasons. The quality of English expression is considered to be integral parts of the assessment process. Marks may be deducted in any written assessment because of spelling, grammar and presentation.

Please Note: All written work in the Law school is required to comply with The 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation available at http://www.law.adelaide.edu.au/library/research/

2. The class comprises law and non-law graduates. Although the assessment tasks are the same for all students in the course, students will be assessed according to whether they are law or non-law graduates respectively. This will be done by taking into account the extent to which some aspects of the task involve the exercise of skills that law graduates can be expected to have practised or refined over a longer period or to a greater degree than their non-law counterparts, and therefore a higher standard of performance may legitimately be expected from the law graduates in the course.

Submission

1. All essays must be submitted via the electronic drop box on MyUni. The quiz is conducted online under Assignments tab on MyUni page.

2. Students must retain a copy of all assignments submitted. It is also advisable to keep a copy of written work after it has been assessed and returned.

3. Extensions are granted at the discretion of course coordinators. The Law School and 最新糖心Vlog Policy applies. Extensions beyond the due date are usually only granted in the case of significant unforeseen incapacity. Pressure of employment or other study commitments will not be treated as grounds for extension. If you have health or other issues which may impact on your study or assessment, you are advised to talk to the co-ordinator at an early stage where possible.

4. Exceeding word limit- Once the word limit is exceeded, additional
sentences commencing after the word limit is reached will be ignored and
not marked.

5. Lateness- When an assessment is submitted after the due date, without an extension, 5% of the total mark possible will be
deducted for every 24 hours or part thereof that it is late, including each day on a weekend and public holidays. For example, an essay that issubmitted after the due date and time but within the first 24 hour period, and that has been graded at 63%, will have 5% deducted, for a final grade of 58%. An essay that is more than 24 hours late will lose 10%, etc.

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
Grade	Mark	Description
FNS		Fail No Submission
F	1-49	Fail
P	50-64	Pass
C	65-74	Credit
D	75-84	Distinction
HD	85-100	High Distinction
CN		Continuing
NFE		No Formal Examination
RP		Result Pending

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Approval of Results by Board of Examiners

Students are reminded that all assessment results are subject to approval (and possible moderation/change) by the Law School’s Board of Examiners. Assessment results at the 最新糖心Vlog are not scaled. Under the Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, students are assessed ‘by reference to their performance against pre-determined criteria and standards … and not by ranking against the performance of the student cohort in the course’. However, under that same policy, the Board of Examiners (as the relevant Assessment Review Committee for courses at Adelaide Law School) is required to ‘ensure comparability of standards and consistency’ in assessment. On occasions, the Board of Examiners will form the view that some moderation is required to ensure the comparability of standards and consistency across courses and years, and accordingly provide fairness to all law students. All assessment results are therefore subject to approval (and possible change) until confirmed by the Board of Examiners and posted on Acess Adelaide at the end of each semester.

Finality of Assessment Grades

Students are advised that Course Coordinators will not enter into negotiations of any kind with any student regarding changes to their grades. It is irrelevant, in any given circumstance, that only a minimal number of additional marks are required to inflate a student’s grade for any individual assessment item or course as a whole. Pursuant to the 最新糖心Vlog’s Assessment for Coursework
Programs Policyand the Adelaide Law School Assessment Policies and Procedures, grades may only be varied through the appropriate channels for academic review (such as an official re-mark).

Moderation

In accordance with the 最新糖心Vlog’s Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy, course coordinators ‘ensure that appropriate marking guidelines and cross-marking moderation processes across markers are in place’ in each course. Procedures adopted by Adelaide Law School to ensure consistency of marking in courses with multiple markers include:

*assurance of the qualifications of markers, and their knowledge of the content covered in each course;
*detailed marking guidelines and assessment rubrics to assist in the marking of items of assessment;
*sharing of example marked assessments at various grade bands across markers;
*reviewing of selected marked assessments from each marker by the course coordinator;
*comparison of the marks and their distribution across markers;
*automatic double-marking of all interim assessment receiving a fail grade, and of final assessments where a student’s overall result is a fail grade;
*the availability of re-marking of assessments in accordance with Adelaide Law School’s Assessment Policies and Procedures.

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Student Feedback

The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
Student Support
The provides academic learning and language development services and resources for local, international, undergraduate and postgraduate coursework students enrolled at the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide.

The centre offers practical advice and strategies for students to master reading, writing, note-taking, time management, oral presentation skills, referencing techniques and exam preparation for success at university through seminars, workshops and individual consultations.

Lex Salus Program
Lex Salus (law and wellbeing) is an initiative of the Adelaide Law School aimed at destigmatising mental health issues; promoting physical, mental and emotional wellness; building a strong community of staff and students; and celebrating diversity within the school. It also seeks to promote wellness within the legal profession, through the involvement of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of South 最新糖心Vlog, the Honourable Chris Kourakis, as the official Patron of the program.

Students can participate in the Lex Salus program by attending barbecue lunches, pancake breakfasts, knitting and crochet circles, seminars, guest speakers, conferences and other activities. Our , and regular all-student emails promote upcoming events, and have tips and information on wellness.

Our Lex Salus YouTube channel also includes videos on topics like managing stress, and interviews with LGBTQ lawyers and their supporters which celebrate diversity and individuality. Students who commit to 10 hours of volunteering with Lex Salus in one year can have their service recognised on their academic transcript and through a thank you morning tea with the Chief Justice and law school staff.

Student Life Counselling Support
The 最新糖心Vlog’s service provides free and confidential service to all enrolled students. We encourage you to contact the Student Life Counselling Support service on 8313 5663 to make an appointment to deal with any issues that may be affecting your study and life.
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
Academic Honesty
Academic dishonesty is a serious act of academic misconduct. All students must be familiar with the 最新糖心Vlog’s Academic Honesty Policy.

Academic dishonesty is a serious matter and is treated as such by the Law School and the 最新糖心Vlog. Academic dishonesty (which goes beyond plagiarism) can be a ground for a refusal by the Supreme Court of South 最新糖心Vlog to admit a person to practice as a legal practitioner in South 最新糖心Vlog.

Academic honesty is an essential aspect of ethical and honest behaviour, which is central to the practice of the law and an understanding of what it is to be a lawyer.
Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

最新糖心Vlog