MANAGEMT 7112 - Marketing Strategy

North Terrace Campus - Summer - 2019

Marketing means many things to many people but one issue is certain, it is the driving force that separates successful organisations from unsuccessful ones in the current fast-changing, global, competitive environment. This course explores what it means to be truly market-driven and to fully realise the power that marketing has to drive your organisation forward. It will explore a variety of issues, including why being market-driven pays off, how to effectively understand the market, how to analyse marketing competencies, how to make strategic choices, how to create and deliver value to customers and finally how to measure marketing effectiveness. These questions will be examined through interactive class discussions, case studies and video cases on leading international organisations.

Open All

Course Details

Course Code	MANAGEMT 7112
Course	Marketing Strategy
Coordinating Unit	Adelaide Business School
Term	Summer
Level	Postgraduate Coursework
Location/s	North Terrace Campus
Units	3
Available for Study Abroad and Exchange	Y
Prerequisites	MANAGEMT 7104
Assessment	Exam/assignments/tests/tutorial work as prescribed at first lecture

Course Staff

Name: Professor John Fahy
Location: Room, Pulteney Street Building
Telephone: 8303
email: john.fahy@ul.ie; john@johnfahy.net
Course Website: www.myuni.adelaide.edu.au; www.johnfahy.net

Course Timetable

The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .

Date	Course Content
January 8	Is your company market driven?
January 10	Do you know what customers want?
January 12	Building an effective customer value proposition
January 15	Developing the customer value proposition
January 17	Creating an integrated marketing strategy
January 19	Group Presentations & Examination

Learning Outcomes

Course Learning Outcomes

By the end of this course you will be able to,

2.1.1     Understand what it means to be a market-driven organisation

2.1.2     Understand the critical role of market insights

2.1.3     Conduct a strategic marketing analysis of a company/industry

2.1.4     Develop skills in making superior market choices

2.1.5     Develop an effective customer value proposition

2.1.6     Develop an effective marketing strategy

最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attributes

No information currently available.
Learning Resources
Required Resources

Text Books (s)
Strategy from the Outside In: Profiting from Customer Value (2010), George Day &
Christine Moorman, New York: McGraw-Hill
Foundations of Marketing, 4th edition (2012), David Jobber & John Fahy,
London: McGraw-Hill.

Cases
Buchanan & Simmons (2009) Trouble Brews at Starbucks
Mukund (2003) Tesco: The Customer Relationship Management Champion
Moon & Herman (2002) Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower
Renault, Dalsace & Ulaga (2010) Michelin Fleet Solutions: From Selling Tires to Selling Kilometres

Bart, Chandon, Sweldens & Seabra de Sousa (2010) Renova Toilet Paper: Avant Garde
Marketing in a Commoditized Category

Readings
Aaker (2012), ‘Win the Brand Relevance Battle and then Build Competitive Barriers,
'California Management Review, 43-57
Barwise, P. & S. Meehan (2004), ‘Don’t be Unique, Be Better,
’Sloan Management Review, Summer, 23-26.
Bertini, M. & L. Wathieu (2010), ‘How to Stop Customers Fixating on Price,
’Harvard Business Review, May, 84-91.
Comstock, B., R. Gulati & S. Liguori (2010), ‘Unleashing the Power of Marketing,’
Harvard Business Review, October, 90-98.
Dixon, M., K. Freeman & N. Toman (2010), ‘Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers,’
Harvard Business Review, July-August, 116-122.
Gunther McGrath, R. (2012), ‘How the Growth Outliers Do It, ’ Harvard Business Review, 111-115.
Hanssens, D., R. Rust & R. Srivastava (2009), ‘Marketing Strategy and Wall Street: Nailing Down Marketing’s Impact,’ Journal of Marketing, November, 115-118.
Lodish, L. and C. Mela (2007), ‘If Brands are Built Over Years, Why are the Managed over Quarters?,’ Harvard Business Review, July-August, 104-112
McAfee, A. and E. Brynjolfsson (2012), ‘Big Data: The Management Revolution,
’Harvard Business Review, 60-68
McDonald, E., H. Wilson & U. Konus (2012) ‘Better Customer Insight in Real Time,
’Harvard Business Review, 102-108
McGovern, G., D. Court, J. Quelch & B. Crawford (2004), ‘Bringing Customers into the Boardroom,
’Harvard Business Review, November, 70-80.
Rust, R., C. Moorman & G. Bhalla (2009), ‘Rethinking Marketing,
’Harvard Business Review, January-February, 94-99.
Simon. H (1996), ‘You Don’t Have to be German to be a ‘Hidden Champion’,’
Business Strategy Review, 1-13
Spenner, P. & K. Freeman (2012), ‘To Keep Your Customers, Keep it Simple,
’Harvard Business Review, 108-114

Recommended Resources
Students may wish to read more widely in specific subject areas, something that the UABS wholeheartedly encourages. There are many general texts and business books on marketing that students may find useful. Also the following journals, magazines and newspapers should be consulted for managerially relevant articles on marketing:
- Harvard Business Review
- Sloan Management Review
- California Management Review
- Business Horizons
- McKinsey Quarterly
- Marketing Week (UK)
- Economist (UK)
- Financial Times (UK)
- Wall Street Journal
Full texts of a great many of the articles that appear in these journals can be accessed via the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide’s library databases
Online Learning

Increasingly much of what you need is available online through websites containing links to articles, cases, free webinars and discussions, etc. A sample of very useful websites include,

Marketingpower.com
McKinsey.com
Economist.com
Ft.com
Wsj.com
Brandchannel.com
Warc.com
Ted.com
Learning & Teaching Activities

Learning & Teaching Modes

The course will take an applied and practical approach making extensive use of case studies, video case studies, exercises and discussions. Students will have ample opportunities to interrogate

particular problems and put forward their own points of view.

Workload

No information currently available.

Learning Activities Summary

January 7                     Is Your Company Market Driven?

Readings:
Day & Moorman (2010); Chapters 1 & 2
Comstock, B., R. Gulati & S. Liguori (2010), ‘Unleashing the Power of Marketing,’Harvard Business Review, October, 90-98.
McGovern, G., D. Court, J. Quelch & B. Crawford (2004), ‘Bringing Customers into the Boardroom,’ Harvard Business Review, November, 70-80.

Case:
Buchanan & Simmons (2009) Trouble Brews at Starbucks

January 9                     Do You Know What Customers Want?

Readings:
Day & Moorman (2010); Chapter 11
McAfee, A. and E. Brynjolfsson (2012), ‘Big Data: The Management Revolution,’ Harvard
Business Review, 60-68
McDonald, E., H. Wilson & U. Konus (2012) ‘Better Customer Insight in Real Time,’Harvard Business Review, 102-108
Spenner, P. & K. Freeman (2012), ‘To Keep Your Customers, Keep it Simple,’ Harvard Business Review, 108-114

Case:
Mukund (2003) Tesco: The Customer Relationship Management Champion

January 11                   Building an Effective Customer Value Proposition

Readings:
Day & Moorman (2010); Chapters 3 & 4.
Barwise, P. & S. Meehan (2004), ‘Don’t be Unique, Be Better,’ Sloan Management Review,
Summer, 23-26.
Dixon, M., K. Freeman & N. Toman (2010), ‘Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers,’
Harvard Business Review, July-August, 116-122.
Simon. H (1996), ‘You Don’t Have to be German to be a ‘Hidden Champion’,
’ Business Strategy Review, 1-13

Case:
Moon & Herman (2002) Aqualisa Quartz: Simply a Better Shower

January 14                   Developing the Customer Value Proposition

Readings:
Day & Moorman (2010); Chapters 5 & 6.
Aaker (2012), ‘Win the Brand Relevance Battle and then Build Competitive Barriers,’
California Management Review, 43-57
Bertini, M. & L. Wathieu (2010), ‘How to Stop Customers Fixating on Price,
’Harvard Business Review, May, 84-91.
Gunther McGrath, R. (2012), ‘How the Growth Outliers Do It,’ Harvard Business Review, 111-115.

Case:
Renault, Dalsace & Ulaga (2010) Michelin Fleet Solutions: From Selling Tires to Selling Kilometres

January 16                   Creating an Integrated Marketing Strategy

Readings:
Day & Moorman (2010); Chapters 12 & 13.
Hanssens, D., R. Rust & R. Srivastava (2009), ‘Marketing Strategy and Wall Street: Nailing Down Marketing’s Impact,’ Journal of Marketing, November, 115-118.
Lodish, L. and C. Mela (2007), ‘If Brands are Built Over Years, Why are the Managed over Quarters?,’ Harvard Business Review, July-August, 104-112
Rust, R., C. Moorman & G. Bhalla (2009), ‘Rethinking Marketing,’ Harvard Business
Review, January-February, 94-99.

Case:
Bart, Chandon, Sweldens & Seabra de Sousa (2010) Renova Toilet Paper: Avant Garde
Marketing in a Commoditized Category

January 18                   Group Presentations & Final Exam

Specific Course Requirements

None

The 最新糖心Vlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:

Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
Assessment must maintain academic standards.

Assessment Summary

Assessmnet Item	Weight	Description	Due Date
Project Presentation	10%	Team Project on Marketing Performance	January 18
Group Project	20%	Team Project on Marketing Performance	January 18
Examination	70%	Case Study Exam	January 18

Assessment Detail

Marketing Performance (Team Project)

Form into teams of four. Your task is to evaluate the marketing strategy of an entity. Feel free to interpret the brief broadly. You may wish to select as the focus of your study an organization, a brand, a political party, an individual etc. However be sure to keep the scope of your project narrow as depth is more important than breadth. What you have to do is assess the marketing strategy of

your chosen target. What aspects of its strategy are strong (if any?), what are weak? etc.

Produce a report of no more than eight pages in three parts.
(a) A brief overview of the focus of study (Weighting = 10%)
(b) Evaluation of marketing strategy & performance (Weighting = 60%)
(c) What lessons can be learned from this case (Weighting = 30%)

Prepare a 15 minute presentation to give to the class allowing 5 minutes for questions

Final Examination (Individual)

The course will finish with a 2 hour case examination. You will be given the case to read two days before the examination. On arrival to class you will be given the case questions. The examination will be OPEN BOOK.

Submission

For written assignments both a hard and electronic copy of submissions is required. Electronic submissions should be in Word or PDF format.

Presentation of Assignments

· Please must retain a copy of all assignments submitted.

· Please attach an ‘Assignment Cover Sheet’, which is signed and dated by you before submission.

· All group assignments must be attached to a ‘Group Assignment Cover Sheet’, which must be signed and dated by all group members before submission. All team members are expected to contribute approximately equally to a group assignment.

Lecturers can refuse to accept assignments,which do not have a signed acknowledgement of the 最新糖心Vlog’s policy onplagiarism.

Assignment Guidelines including Referencing Details

A copy of the Postgraduate Programs: Communication Skills Guide will have been given to you at the beginning of your program. This guide will assist you structure your assignments. A copy of the guide can also be downloaded from

This publication also provides guidelines on a range of other important communication skills including writing essays and management reports, making oral presentations etc.

In preparing any written piece of assessment for your postgraduate studies it is important to draw on the relevant ‘literature’ to support critical analysis. Also essential is to reference the literature used. Correct referencing is important because it identifies the source of the ideas and arguments that you present, and sometimes the source of the actual words you use, and helps to avoid the problem of plagiarism. (Further information on plagiarism is provided later in this course outline.) The Harvard system is widely used in the Business School. Guidelines for the use of this style of referencing can be found in the Communication Skills Guide.

Further assistance with referencing is available from the Faculty’s Learning Support Advisors. The contact details are provided on page 6 of the Communication Skills Guide.

Late Assignment Submission

Students are expected to submit their work by the due date to maintain a fair and equitable system. Extensions will generally only be given for medical or other serious reasons. All requests for extensions must be emailed to the lecturer in charge of the course before the due date. Each request will be assessed on its merits. A late assignment (without prior arrangement) will be penalised by a 5% mark reduction for each day that it is late.

Return of Assignments

Lecturer’s aim to mark and return assignments to students within two (2) weeks of the due date with written feedback. Students are responsible for collecting their marked assignments from either their tutorials or lectures. If assignments aren’t collected after two (2) weeks, the assignments will be available at the Student Hub for two (2) weeks. The remaining assignments will only be posted out to the students, if the correct mailing addresses are on the assignments.

Course Grading

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:

M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme)
Grade	Mark	Description
FNS		Fail No Submission
F	1-49	Fail
P	50-64	Pass
C	65-74	Credit
D	75-84	Distinction
HD	85-100	High Distinction
CN		Continuing
NFE		No Formal Examination
RP		Result Pending

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.

Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the
following scheme: MS8

MS8

Grade	Description
HD 85-100%	Exceptional performance indicating complete and comprehensive understanding of the course matter; genuine mastery of relevant skills; demonstration of an extremely high level of interpretative and analytical ability and intellectual initiative; and achievement of all major and minor objectives of the course.
D 75-84%	Excellent performance indicating a very high level of understanding of the course matter; development of relevant skills to a very high level; demonstration of a very high level of interpretive and analytical ability and intellectual initiative; and achievement of all major and minor objectives of the course.
C 65-74%	Good performance indicating a high level of understanding of course matter; development of relevant skills to a high level; demonstration of a high level of interpretive and analytical ability and achievement of all major objectives of the course; some minor objectives not fully achieved.
P 50-64%	Satisfactory performance indicating an adequate understanding of most of the basic course matter; partial development of relevant skills; adequate interpretive and analytical ability and achievement of most major objectives of the course; failure to achieve some minor objectives.

Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from:
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/student/exams/results.html

Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is
expected at each grade level (see: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/700/ )

Final results for this course will be made available through .

Student Feedback

The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.

The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as CEQ surveys and Program reviews.

SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/ ), course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at least once every 2 years. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g.

MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data can be found at:
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/selt/aggregates

Academic Support	Maths, writing and speaking skills
Counselling Service	Personal counselling for issues affecting study
International Student Care	Ongoing support
Student Care	Advocacy, confidential counselling, welfare support and advice
Students with a Disability	Alternative academic arrangements Alternative Examination Arrangements Policy Reasonable Adjustments to Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy

This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.

Assessment for Coursework Programs
Cheating in Examinations and Related Forms of Assessment
Copyright
Examinations
Plagiarism
Student Grievance Resolution Process
Unsatisfactory Academic Progress by Coursework Students

Fraud Awareness

Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.

The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.

Authorised by:	Deputy Vice-Chancellor and Vice-President (Academic)
Maintained by:	Course Outlines Administrator

最新糖心Vlog