LAW 3527 - Public Law Internship Programme
North Terrace Campus - Summer - 2014
-
General Course Information
Course Details
Course Code LAW 3527 Course Public Law Internship Programme Coordinating Unit Adelaide Law School Term Summer Level Undergraduate Law (LLB) Location/s North Terrace Campus Units 3 Contact Up to 3 hours per week Prerequisites LAW 2504 Restrictions Available to LLB students only. Enrolment is by selection only, please consult with Course Coordinator for eligibility. Assessment Typically to include the preparation of a portfolio related to the placement and a research essay. Course Staff
Course Coordinator: Associate Professor Laura Grenfell
Course Timetable
The full timetable of all activities for this course can be accessed from .
-
Learning Outcomes
Course Learning Outcomes
No information currently available.
最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attributes
This course will provide students with an opportunity to develop the Graduate Attribute(s) specified below:
最新糖心Vlog Graduate Attribute Course Learning Outcome(s) -
Learning & Teaching Activities
Learning & Teaching Modes
The internships enable students to build on their understanding of the theory of public law by gaining an appreciation of its practical operation. The course aims to give depth and context to students’ existing knowledge of public law. It is expected that students will be involved in day-to-day activities of their internship office and gain a broad understanding of how such accountability organisations operate and of the operation of public law generally.Workload
No information currently available.
Learning Activities Summary
No information currently available.
Specific Course Requirements
The course places students in "internships" for a total period of 25 days, with each day being a 71/2 hour day). -
Assessment
The 最新糖心Vlog's policy on Assessment for Coursework Programs is based on the following four principles:
- Assessment must encourage and reinforce learning.
- Assessment must enable robust and fair judgements about student performance.
- Assessment practices must be fair and equitable to students and give them the opportunity to demonstrate what they have learned.
- Assessment must maintain academic standards.
Assessment Summary
Assessment Item % of final mark Due date Length Redeemable Learning Outcomes Portfolio – Part 1 – Agreed research task/essay 70% The due date will be upon completion of the internship negotiated between the student and the course co-ordinator. However, all work must be in, at least, 2 weeks after the end of the teaching semester. 3500 words No 1 - 7 Portfolio – Part 2 – 3 x Diary summaries 30% The first of these summaries must be submitted in the first 4 weeks of the internship. 500 words each No 1 - 7 Assessment Detail
The Portfolio
The portfolio has three components:
(1) an agreed research task/essay (approximately 3500 words) (worth 70%);
(2) 3 x 500 word diary summaries to be emailed during the course of the internship that identify and analyse (i) how the internship is helping to develop their legal skills; (ii) the applicable law; and, (iii) the effectiveness of the legal processes they are observing/interacting with. (worth 30%).
The first of these summaries must be submitted after the first two intensive weeks of the internship so that feedback can be provided to assist in the preparation of subsequent summaries and preparation of the research essay.
Upon completion of your internship, you will be required to hand up Parts 1 and 3 of the portfolio on a negotiated date.
1. The Agreed Research Task
The subject of your research task will be negotiated with the subject co-ordinator. Ideally the focus of this research task/essay should be a practical one relating to your internship.
For example, if you are asked to research and write a paper for the organisation, you may use this as the base of your task/essay as long as you have the organisation’s permission to do so. This permission is important, especially where the material you are looking at is of a confidential nature.
Or you can use your experience as the basis of your paper – eg. What are the limits of the Ombudsman’s powers? Why?
Your research task/essay must have a legal focus and include legal analysis.
The due date for the portfolio will be negotiated between the student and the course co-ordinator. In general the rule is that all work must be submitted at least before the commencement of the next semester.
Students may re-submit only the essay for academic cause (more than 45%). Other parts of the portfolio cannot be resubmitted.
Students are reminded that a conceded pass (45-49%) in this course does not count as a pass in the course for the purposes of the LLB (see the relevant academic program rules). If a student receives a conceded pass in this course, they may do further work on their essay and resubmit it. In this case, their essay will be remarked, and if the new mark on the essay raises their overall mark to a passing grade, the student will be awarded 50% for the course.
Grade Descriptors for the Essay:
Fail 0-49• Does not develop coherent and rational arguments• Demonstrates fundamental errors of understanding of key legal principles and concepts• Minimal evidence of research to support argument• Absence of legal analysis and reflection on practical experience• Demonstrates limited analytical and evaluative skillsPass 50-64%• Adequate articulation of argument• Demonstrates a basic understanding and application of analytic concepts and theoretical concepts• Minimal adherence to citation style• Adequate relevant research informing the argument• Basic understanding of that reading• Minimal reflection on practical experience• Insufficient legal analysis and reflection• Adequate skills in written expression and presentationCredit 65-74• Demonstrates a high level of understanding of the relevant legal materials• Shows a thorough understanding of relevant legal materials• Demonstrates some critical legal thinking and evaluative skills• Adequate legal analysis• Adequate reflection on practical experience• Adequate skills in written expression and presentationDistinction 75-84• High standard of understanding of the relevant legal materials with some original and sophisticated perspectives• High level of insight and legal analysis• High level of reflection on practical experience• Broad ranging legal research skills• Evidence of high level of critical legal thinking• Well developed analytical and evaluative skills• Developed skills in written expression and presentation
High Distinction 85-100• Outstanding level of understanding and interpretation• Outstanding level of reflection on practical experience• Compelling, well-supported and tightly structured legal arguments• Broad ranging research and original and sophisticated thinking• Highly developed written communication skillsSubmission
PRESENTATION OF ASSIGNMENTS
Students must retain a copy of all assignments submitted.- All parts of the assessment must be emailed to the course coordinator
- There will be a penalty of 5% per day or part thereof for any late submission without a formal extension of the time granted.
- The Portfolio must:
- Be footnoted (substantive footnotes will be included in the word count)
- Be double-spaced and paginated
- Have a bibliography appropriate for the topic
- Adhere to the word limit.
Students must use the 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation.
RETURN OF ASSIGNMENTS AND FEEDBACK
Assignments will be returned to students within 2-3 weeks of the due date with written feedback.
Students must not submit work for an assignment that has previously been submitted for any other course.Course Grading
Grades for your performance in this course will be awarded in accordance with the following scheme:
M10 (Coursework Mark Scheme) Grade Mark Description FNS Fail No Submission F 1-49 Fail P 50-64 Pass C 65-74 Credit D 75-84 Distinction HD 85-100 High Distinction CN Continuing NFE No Formal Examination RP Result Pending Further details of the grades/results can be obtained from Examinations.
Grade Descriptors are available which provide a general guide to the standard of work that is expected at each grade level. More information at Assessment for Coursework Programs.
Final results for this course will be made available through .
-
Student Feedback
The 最新糖心Vlog places a high priority on approaches to learning and teaching that enhance the student experience. Feedback is sought from students in a variety of ways including on-going engagement with staff, the use of online discussion boards and the use of Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT) surveys as well as GOS surveys and Program reviews.
SELTs are an important source of information to inform individual teaching practice, decisions about teaching duties, and course and program curriculum design. They enable the 最新糖心Vlog to assess how effectively its learning environments and teaching practices facilitate student engagement and learning outcomes. Under the current SELT Policy (http://www.adelaide.edu.au/policies/101/) course SELTs are mandated and must be conducted at the conclusion of each term/semester/trimester for every course offering. Feedback on issues raised through course SELT surveys is made available to enrolled students through various resources (e.g. MyUni). In addition aggregated course SELT data is available.
-
Student Support
- Academic Integrity for Students
- Academic Support with Maths
- Academic Support with writing and study skills
- Careers Services
- Library Services for Students
- LinkedIn Learning
- Student Life Counselling Support - Personal counselling for issues affecting study
- Students with a Disability - Alternative academic arrangements
-
Policies & Guidelines
This section contains links to relevant assessment-related policies and guidelines - all university policies.
- Academic Credit Arrangements Policy
- Academic Integrity Policy
- Academic Progress by Coursework Students Policy
- Assessment for Coursework Programs Policy
- Copyright Compliance Policy
- Coursework Academic Programs Policy
- Intellectual Property Policy
- IT Acceptable Use and Security Policy
- Modified Arrangements for Coursework Assessment Policy
- Reasonable Adjustments to Learning, Teaching & Assessment for Students with a Disability Policy
- Student Experience of Learning and Teaching Policy
- Student Grievance Resolution Process
-
Fraud Awareness
Students are reminded that in order to maintain the academic integrity of all programs and courses, the university has a zero-tolerance approach to students offering money or significant value goods or services to any staff member who is involved in their teaching or assessment. Students offering lecturers or tutors or professional staff anything more than a small token of appreciation is totally unacceptable, in any circumstances. Staff members are obliged to report all such incidents to their supervisor/manager, who will refer them for action under the university's student鈥檚 disciplinary procedures.
The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide is committed to regular reviews of the courses and programs it offers to students. The 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide therefore reserves the right to discontinue or vary programs and courses without notice. Please read the important information contained in the disclaimer.
