最新糖心Vlog

Students will be allocated into groups of 5 maximum within their workshop. Your group will be required to analyse and interpret a case study. While there are often multiple ways to analyse and interpret a case study, this assessment requires you to problem solve and make decisions about specific and potentialy complex and ambiguous aspects about a well known organisation. Further assignment details for the group report will become accessible via MyUni.

Before attempting this assessment you should be familiar with at least the first seven topics of the course content. You are also expected to use material provided from the case material to support your analysis and responses. Each group will be required to produce a professional looking (Times New Roman 12pt or equivalent and 1.5 line spacing) academic report. A key aspect of your grade will be related to how well your group responds to the challenge of:

1) including all the relevant information in a well-written, concise maximum 2000 word academic report,
2) skilfully applying the appropriate theories and frameworks covered in class, and
3) formulating and presenting arguments which are convincing and supported by case evidence.

Once your group report is completed, one group member will submit ONE group assignment file electronically on the MyUni course website. By submitting an assignment via MyUni all students in the group students are deemed to have agreed to the 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide's Academic Honesty Policy Statement which gives permission for any assessed assignments to be reproduced and submitted to other academic staff for the purposes of assessment and to be copied, submitted and retained in a form suitable for electronic checking of plagiarism. Turnitin similarity software will be utilised to indicate potential plagiarism.

Each student will also be required to submit a confidential evaluation (online peer assessment) of the group work effectiveness of each member of their group. Each student’s group work effectiveness score will be compared to that of their group. Individuals who have an average group work effectiveness score greater than that of their group may have their individual group mark increased. Conversely, students who have an average effectiveness score lower than that of their group may have their individualll mark decreased. Criteria to assess an individual’s group work effectiveness is generally based on the following questions (from strongly agree to strongly disagree):

• The group member communicated effectively with other members in the group.
• The group member completed their fair share of the group's work in a timely manner.
• The group member was punctual and regularly attended meetings and other group activities.
• The group member was well prepared for group activities.
• The group member genuinely considered and (where relevant) took on board other members' perspectives.

Assessment 4: Final Exam (30%)

More information will become available via the MyUni course website.

The purpose of the final exam is to assess your knowledge and understanding of the concepts covered in this course. Specifically, how analysis and synthesis underpin the sound long-term direction, scope and performance of an organisation and how strategic success is contingent on the fit between the organisation and the relevant environmental dynamics.

The exam will be 3 hours in length and conducted during the scheduled examination period. While the focus on the assessment will be on topics 6 onwards, all topics covered in this course will be assessable. The timing of the exam will be known when the appropriate examination timetable is released by the 最新糖心Vlog.

Please note that to be eligible for Additional Assessment (previously referred to as Supplementary Examinations) in this course ALL required assessment tasks must be submitted.