最新糖心Vlog

Cornelia Koch
Senior Lecturer
Ligertwood Building, room 322
Phone: 8313 5713
Email: cornelia.koch@adelaide.edu.au
Staff website:
Find selected publications on my SSRN Author page:
Consultation: Thursdays 3-4pm or by appointment

General academic learning outcomes:

(1) To promote in students a more complete understanding of their own legal systems;

(2) To employ the methods of jurisprudence and legal history in order to deepen students’ understanding not just of their own law, but of law as such;

(3) To develop in students a sense of history and chronology in relation to the evolution of major legal institutions in some of the world’s most important jurisdictions;

(4) To develop in students a critical approach to the virtues and imperfections of concepts employed by legal systems in formulating legal rules and principles;

(5) To introduce students to foreign legal cultures;

(6) To lessen unreflective national prejudice and to improve international understanding.

Professional learning outcomes:

(7) To prepare students for the performance of tasks involved in law reform projects, whether these involve legal innovation, harmonization or the unification of their domestic law;

(8) To impart to students the forensic skills needed to apply foreign legal rules, principles and provisions which are attracted by conflicts principles;

(9) To prepare students for issues that may arise when they communicate with foreign lawyers.

There is no prescribed textbook for this course. A complete set of reading materials will be issued to students in hard copy. The same materials will also be available on MyUni.

MyUni can be found at .

Some important works are on reserve in the Law Library. Students may find them useful as additional reading and for the completion of their research assignment.

Should students want to refer to an introductory text, the following is recommended:

Martin Vranken, Fundamentals of European Civil Law (Federation Press, 2nd ed, 2010) Chapters 1-6, 9, 10 (2 copies on reserve in Law Library)

The 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation (3rd ed, 2010) (available electronically at  and in hard copy in the Law Library and for purchase at Unibooks)

Additional web-links, further resources, assessment, important messages, topic notes, power point slides, case studies and other materials relating to the course will be placed on MyUni throughout the course. You should check the Comparative Law course link on MyUni regularly.

The course is undertaken through face-to-face class sessions to facilitate interactions between the lecturer and students. Accordingly there is an expectation that you will attend all of the scheduled classes.

There will be lecture and class discussion components to the teaching and students are encouraged to be involved in the intellectual discussions and interact with each other and the lecturer as much as possible

The 最新糖心Vlog expects full-time students (i.e. those taking 12 units per semester) to devote a total of 312 hours for a six unit course

Please note: the following list of seminar topics is preliminary. A final list with relevant dates will be made available on MyUni by 13 Feb 2014.

Course Overview and Introduction

Why compare?

How to compare?

Legal comparison and its uses

Families of legal systems; evaluation of differing legal solutions to social problems; legal history and comparative law

Classification of Legal Systems and Comparative Law Methodology including postmodernist critique of comparative law

The impact of values on legal systems: ideological values

Religious and secular values

Common law values

Constitutionally entrenched values and their impact on legal systems

Conflicts of values, particularly in multi-cultural societies

Comparative Law in the Courts:Roper v Simmons, Re Kevin

Religious elements: The Law of God in Western countries

The Roman law legacy

The common law legacy

Introduction to the origins of legal systems in Muslim countries

The codification movement

Human rights as effective elements of government

Legal Convergence in the EU

Civil procedure – Common law and German law

Assessment item	% of final mark	Due date	Group or individual assessment	Redeemable	Learning Outcome
Research Assignment	50%	Due Monday 2 June 2014	individual	no	4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Seminar Presentation	20%	To be determined with students	individual	no	2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Online Examination	10%	8 May 2014	individual	no	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Online Examination	10%	5 June 2014	individual	no	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Seminar Participation	10%	All seminars	individual	no	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

 There are five components of assessment for this course. Each part of the assessment scheme is compulsory. This means that if any one of the items of assessment is not undertaken/submitted, the marks assigned for that assessment will be irrevocably lost, and the final mark obtainable will be reduced by that amount.

You are expected to attend all classes, however allowance will be made where you have missed no more than 2 for unforeseen circumstances such as illness, transport difficulties, work and family demands etc. You are strongly encouraged to speak with your lecturer if you have any particular difficulties with regularly attending. Marks are awarded for class participation which includes attendance.

PRESENTATION OF ASSIGNMENTS
The assignment must be written in prose style (using complete sentences), adhere to grammatical rules and use correct spelling. It should be typed in Times New Roman font, using double spaced paragraphs and at least 12pt font size. The pages must be numbered and the margins should be at least 2.5 cm wide. The essay should include a table of contents and a bibliography. Each paper must be clearly marked with the student’s 最新糖心Vlog of Adelaide number. Markers can refuse to accept assignments which do not have a signed acknowledgment of the 最新糖心Vlog’s policy on plagiarism (refer to policy on plagiarism below).

All written work in the Law School is required to comply with, The 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation available at .

Hard copies of The 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation are on Reserve in the Law Library and can also be purchased from UniBooks.

Please make sure you have looked at this before you submit any written work.

(I) RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT
(50% of the final result)
This aspect of the assessment will provide students with feedback regarding their level of understanding of the course material and their research, written communication and critical thinking skills.
Students must submit a 5000-word essay. Some topics will be suggested by the course co-ordinator, but students are encouraged to select their own topics with the cooperation and approval of the co-ordinator. Topics chosen by students must be approved by 24 March 2014.
The deadline for submission is Monday 2 June 2014 at 2pm.

Assessment Criteria
• level of insight and innovative thought
• depth of analysis and level of critical examination of the issues raised
• clarity of expression
• logical planning and sequence
• evidence of comprehensive research and consideration of the relevant literature
• demonstrated understanding of the comparative law method
• demonstrated understanding of relevant legal materials
• correct application of relevant material
• overall presentation, including correct grammar, spelling and punctuation
• use of resources in formulating the paper including proper acknowledgment and correct referencing

Fail 0 – 49
Does not develop coherent and rational arguments; demonstrates fundamental errors of understanding of key legal principles and concepts; little evidence of research to support arguments; demonstrates limited analytical and evaluative skills

Pass 50 – 64
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the relevant legal material eg legislation, cases and treaties; applies core texts and materials; arguments rational and coherent; adheres to referencing requirements

Credit 65 – 74
Demonstrates a high level of understanding of the relevant legal materials; has a thorough understanding of course materials; arguments are well constructed with appropriate supporting referencing; demonstrates some critical legal thinking and evaluative skills

Distinction 75 – 84
A very high standard of understanding of the relevant legal materials with some original and sophisticated perspectives included; paper demonstrates high level insight; broad ranging research undertaken; evidence of high level of critical thinking; well developed analytical and evaluative skills

High Distinction 85 - 100
Outstanding level of understanding and interpretation demonstrated; arguments are compelling and well supported by relevant authorities; student has undertaken broad ranging research and demonstrated original and sophisticated thinking especially in relation to difficult areas of legal application; highly developed written communication skills demonstrated.

Feedback: by 23 June 2014


(II) SEMINAR PRESENTATION
(20% of the final result)
This aspect of the assessment will provide students with feedback regarding their level of understanding of the course material and their oral communication and critical thinking skills.
Each student will be assigned a topic and class date on which he or she will have to give a presentation to the class. The student will be provided with readings for this topic, but is encouraged to conduct some further independent research. The rest of the class will also be provided with the readings, to facilitate group discussion.
The presenter will have to give a presentation on the assigned topic and lead class discussion during the seminar. Every presentation inclusive of class discussion will take 50 minutes.

Assessment Criteria
• level of insight and innovative thought
• depth of analysis and level of critical examination of the issues raised
• clarity of expression
• logical planning and sequence
• evidence of comprehensive research and consideration of the relevant literature
• demonstrated understanding of relevant legal materials
• correct application of relevant material
• overall presentation, including clarity of language, structure, appropriate use of visual and other aids

Fail 0 – 49
Does not develop coherent and rational arguments; demonstrates fundamental errors of understanding of key legal principles and concepts; demonstrates limited analytical and evaluative skills

Pass 50 – 64
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the relevant materials; applies core texts and materials; arguments rational and coherent;

Credit 65 – 74
Demonstrates a high level of understanding of the relevant legal materials; has a thorough understanding of course materials and how the presentation fits within the course as a whole; arguments are well constructed; demonstrates some critical legal thinking and evaluative skills

Distinction 75 – 84
A very high standard of understanding of the relevant legal materials with some original and sophisticated perspectives included; presentation demonstrates high level insight; relevant research undertaken; evidence of high level of critical thinking; well developed analytical and evaluative skills

High Distinction 85 - 100
Outstanding level of understanding and interpretation demonstrated; arguments are compelling and well supported by relevant authorities; student has undertaken the relevant research and demonstrated original and sophisticated thinking especially in relation to difficult areas of legal application; highly developed oral communication skills demonstrated.

Feedback: within two weeks of the date of the presentation


(III) and (IV) Two Online Examinations
(Each 10% of the final result)

Administered in class on Thursday 8 May and Thursday 5 June 2014, conducted in a computer suite. Students will be notified of the exact location via MyUni.

These examinations will consist of short answer and multiple choice questions. The first exam will test students’ critical understanding of the course contents covered in weeks 1-6 of the semester. The second exam will test students’ critical understanding of the course contents covered in weeks 7-12 of the semester.

Both examinations will be closed book tests. (60 minutes). The tests are intended to show how well students are able to absorb efficiently and quickly information which conveys factual matters and legal considerations. The questions are intended to test the level at which the material studied has been understood and is being recalled. To avoid misunderstanding, it should be made clear that this test has nothing to do with rote learning. The questions are sufficiently complex to ensure that understanding them is, in itself, an important part of the test. Students will be given sample questions so that they know what to expect.

The great advantage of this form of testing is that marking does not depend on subjective judgment. Furthermore, foreign students whose native language is not English are not at a disadvantage. The results are objective and reliable; they are usually well distributed over the whole of the available range from high distinction to failure. Rarely is there any bunching around the pass mark. The limitation of this kind of examination is that it tests only a limited range of capacities and must therefore be supplemented by other, more traditional forms of assessment (see (I), (II), (V)).

Feedback: within one week of the date of the examination


(V) SEMINAR PARTICIPATION
(10% of the final result)
This aspect of the assessment is designed to facilitate student engagement with the course materials during the course; to ensure student understanding of the material at an early stage prior to submitting written assessment; and to facilitate development of students’ oral communication skills. Students who wish to succeed with this aspect of the assessment will need to prepare for each session by careful study of the assigned material.

Assessment Criteria
• attendance at classes
• demonstrated evidence of preparation
• demonstrated understanding of course material
• overall contribution of information that is relevant to the subject
• demonstrated analysis, synthesis and critical thinking
• responsiveness to other contributions
• use of supporting references

Fail 0 – 49
Failure to attend or contribute to class discussion; lack of responsiveness to questions

Pass 50 – 64
Regular attendance; limited contribution to class discussion; contribution to class discussion evident but not well developed

Credit 65 – 74
Regular attendance; frequent and thoughtful contribution to class discussion; sound level of critical thinking and knowledge demonstrated

Distinction 75 – 84
Regular attendance; frequent contribution to class discussion of a highly developed nature – well supported by references; demonstrating high level of critical thinking

High Distinction 85 – 100
Regular attendance; outstanding level of contribution to class discussion in terms of understanding of course material, responsiveness to other contributions and use of supporting references

Feedback: 16 June 2014

All assignments in this course are to be submitted electronically through Turnitin. By submitting your assignment electronically you are agreeing to the following:

I declare that all material in this assessment is my own work except where there is clear acknowledgement and reference to the work of others. I have read the Policy on Cheating in Examinations and Related Forms of Assessment. I have also read the 最新糖心Vlog's Plagiarism Policy.

Details for electronic submission through Turnitin will be provided with the assignment instructions and on MyUni.

All written work in the Law school is required to comply with the approved Law School style guide, The 最新糖心Vlogn Guide to Legal Citation.

Extensions: Requests for extensions must be made via email to the course coordinator. Extensions will be granted only for unexpected illness, hardship or on compassionate grounds in accordance with 最新糖心Vlog Policy. Work commitments, travel, holidays or sporting engagements are not unexpected circumstances.

Penalties:

Turnaround time: The assignment for this course will be returned to students within 3 weeks of the submission date. Marked assignments with feedback will be available electronically on MyUni.